Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Hardy Needs to be the Full-Time Starter


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

2 games still doesn't make up for the huge disparity between Johnson's and Brayton's numbers. Hardy has been a backup. If you take your mouth off Brayton's nutsack you can see the light.

I guess Brian Baker and Ron Meeks, who have chosen to start Brayton over all the other DE's for three seasons now, should probably get their mouths off his nutsack too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess Brian Baker and Ron Meeks, who have chosen to start Brayton over all the other DE's for three seasons now, should probably get their mouths off his nutsack too.

He only starting because he's been in the league longer and they want veteran leadership (even if i think thats over rated). That should be obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh poo don't compare me to CRA. I'm mainly just being a cock. But for real, Brayton is good, guys. He's been good for us for three seasons now. No, he doesn't put up the sacks but he's great against the run and does a good his job.

ya but the time is now not last year or the year before. I'm sorry bro but brayton hasn't looked all too well against the run this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, that's probably why Clowney and Thomas are starting over Gettis and Lafell too.

Because vets that have had the same production as rookies coming into the league shouldn't start yet. Especially when one of them is a high draft pick. Brayton, who has been steadily good, is starting because of how he's played in the past and the number of years he's been in the league. You don't start rookies over the good vet yet until they exceed that vet. Right now Hardy is exceeding Brayton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...