Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's Talk Passing Defense


vanilla B

Recommended Posts

Long time reader and first time poster, I didnt see this anywhere but we currently have a top 10 defense in total yards allowed and ranked 4th in passing yards allowed. Granted we are still giving up over 21 points a game but if our offense can start staying on the field for more than 2 minutes a series like we saw against San Francisco, I believe our ranking could improve in that area as well. Just thought I'd point out the hard work of the secondary this season and see what you all thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm cautiously optimistic when it comes to our D. Sometimes having a great statistical pass D is because teams can run on you at will, or get up early enough in games that they can put it in cruise control and no longer feel the need to pass.

That being said, our guys do swarm to the ball quickly and have been playing very well lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of a double-edged sword.

Meeks has generally run defenses that were strong against the pass, but sometimes vulnerable to the run.

Given that it's a passing league, this isn't the worst thing in the world, but it could still be a concern.

True statement. But couldn't one argue that they never had any good, run-stopping DTs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True statement. But couldn't one argue that they never had any good, run-stopping DTs?

They got Anthony McFarland because of those issues. Pretty sure that was the year they went to the Super Bowl. Bob Sanders helped too as a good run stuffing safety.

What also helped the Colts was that with Peyton running a high-scoring offense, opposing teams often had abandon the run and go all pass in order to play catch up. That allowed the defense to just pin its ears back and rush without worrying much about being beaten by the run. Worked for a while, but by the end people were exploiting it by running at them even when they were behind. And a lot of the time, it worked.

We might conceivably have been able to have a high-scoring offense like that in 2008, but we're definitely not there this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can get the right coaching staff in offseason and develop our rookies, along with D-Lo, Goodson, and Stewart we could have a potentially high-scoring offense. If we can shore up the problems on the defensive line we could have all the ingredients to a true consistent contender. Just depends on if the new coach can figure out how to properly use them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True statement. But couldn't one argue that they never had any good, run-stopping DTs?

If you are talking about a Meeks defense then possibly true. If you are talking about the Panthers then definitely not true. Jenkins was a beast against the run. And Trgo's defenses were pretty stout against the run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is the fastest secondary we've ever had in the history of the Panthers franchise. That might translate into the highest number of interceptions in Panther history this season.

In 2005 we had 23 INTs using Cover-2, which favors the CBs.

Gamble - 7

Lucas - 6

McCree - 3

Spoon - 2

Wallace - 2

Minter - 1

We must have fire zone blitzed a lot for Wallace to have 2 picks. If I remember correctly, Minter had a chance for a lot more INTs than just the 1 got.

In 2001 we had 24 INTS, with Doug Evans racking up 8 of them.

26 INTS in 2004, but Smith broke his ankle in the first game against the Packers. If this team want the INT record, then they will need to beat the 04' teams 26 picks.

Here's how things look in 10':

Godfrey - 4

Marshall - 1

Pugh - 1

Anderson - 1

Brown - 1

Johnson - 1 (lol)

Captain - 1

So 10 picks for 2010 with Godrey going crazy. Expect Martin to get a lot of picks as the season moves along because our Tampa-2 favors the safety in pass coverage (they have less ground to cover compared to Cover-2.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...