Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

McNabb might be availble next year as FA


raleigh-panther

Recommended Posts

Things seem a little shaky in DC.

Not my favorite QB by any stretch, and yes I know he is West Coast; but, depending on who the new Coach is, he might be a good FA stop gap.

He may find Carolina a little more to his liking than DC as well.

I never felt he was too warm and fuzzy on the Redskins.

Stop. QB is not even close to being our main problem out there. It has not been all year, and it was proven once again today.

Put in Matt, Clausen, McNabb, Brady, the next top draft pick. Won't make a single difference with this O-line, with this attrocious running game, receiver corps, and mainly with this team playing this BAD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop. QB is not even close to being our main problem out there. It has not been all year, and it was proven once again today.

this thread isn't really about this year, though. You're right, but next year, we're going to need to solve those issues, too.

next year we're going to want a veteran QB in some form, though I don't know McNabb is that guy, because I think it would help a lot to have someone on the sidelines with some experience, but I expect he'll go some place he can start right off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

exactly.

I disagree that QB isn't a problem. It is a problem and a Veteran is needed.

As for locking threads, come on guys, this is a forum. The news today is that things aren't quite so rosy in DC. How is this any different than than the 1000 threads on what coach we should have or what QB is preferred.

Regardless, lock away, my feelings won't be hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this thread isn't really about this year, though. You're right, but next year, we're going to need to solve those issues, too.

next year we're going to want a veteran QB in some form, though I don't know McNabb is that guy, because I think it would help a lot to have someone on the sidelines with some experience, but I expect he'll go some place he can start right off.

And both Matt or Clausen will be up for that job by next year. Matt's already proven he can be consisent with a GOOD team. Clausen should get better by then too.

The main problem is getting the TEAM to be good and that calls for a lot of other changes besides QB.

I know it's a lot easier to just throw the blame on Matt, and talk about how a replacement is going to fix everything. It won't. Not even close.

This forum has been so blinded with the QB debate, we no longer even want to take a GOOD LOOK at what the problem really is out there. Today, up until the 4th quarter the QB was NOT the problem. By the time Matt became a problem the game was done. He was actually one of the few guys that were playing a solid game out there. Do you guys even want to take a look at what REALLY happened?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's were we disagree.

I don't think Moore is going to be back.

His contract expires and I doubt very seriously that the new regime will bring him back.

Ok well if he won't be we'll still have Clausen. And if it turns out Clausen is still shaky, and we need a another vet we can talk about that then.

In the mean time most should still be talking about the O-line, receivers, team attitude(Steve Smith), and overall coaching and management.

If you don't start at the TOP, and fix the managment and coaching NONE of this discussion matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • On offense, QB and RB are a thing. QB needs to improve a fair amount, and the RBs have me unsure if they can match last year’s  level. Brooks being the big mystery. It seems like they think he is good to go, they didn’t do that much to ad insurance.    You have to think the defense will be better. We are young in a lot of places and can hope for some growth from a few guys, as the season progresses.    I think other teams in our division helped themselves too though. Every single one of them picked in front of us for three days and took players we might have taken over who was there for us.  
    • ??? Trevin is a lot of things, but slow is not one of them.
    • I'm holding out hope for Wallace and I feel like Dan wants this LB to hit. I still feel like Edgerrin Cooper was "their guy" and he got sniped from the FO. They also chose Wallace over Payton Wilson, so I think there's some ego there from the former LB. I also think Wallace has had some pretty mid partners the past two years. Josey, Rozeboom, and a bunch of PS/journeymen haven't helped his case.  We probably thought he could be "the guy" at ILB but he's shown that's not the case. Now the question is, can he be a "Robin" to Lloyd's "Batman".  As for Cherillus, I like him as a depth guy and have never thought of him as a starter. He flashed a number of times last year. Bam Martin-Scott is another depth/PS guy that we drafted with the hopes he could step up given the opportunity. He's the exact same build, 2 years younger than Cherelus and produced similar stats last year.  Iron sharpens iron. Let's go gents....time to step up or show yourself out. 
×
×
  • Create New...