Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SO...


The Saltman

Recommended Posts

That's what I was tryin to get at.

A fat or ugly chick in the group makes the rest of the girls hotter by default.

you guys really think that's the way WE think? Thats the way you guys think. We aren't saying, hey, I wanna hang out with this girl b/c in the end, I'm gonna look hotter next to her. I really don't think that is the case at all.

A girl is hot or ugly no matter what. Someone standing beside her is not going to change anything except for the way YOU view us, not the way we see ourselves. I could care less if the girl standing beside me "makes" me look hot, I don't even understand how that is possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you guys really think that's the way WE think? Thats the way you guys think. We aren't saying, hey, I wanna hang out with this girl b/c in the end, I'm gonna look hotter next to her. I really don't think that is the case at all.

A girl is hot or ugly no matter what. Someone standing beside her is not going to change anything except for the way YOU view us, not the way we see ourselves. I could care less if the girl standing beside me "makes" me look hot, I don't even understand how that is possible.

We are saying that's what most girls think. You are the exception to the rule because most women do not like football or will tolerate the functional retards on the Huddle.

You always see these type of examples anywhere you go:

hilarious_138.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It should be a facto, because while he needs to perform to keep his job, you still have to build with an eye to the future. Where we will be drafting, there is a more than good chance of there being a player there at a position of more need, such as OT, LB, TE, S, or CB. With all those holes, I just don’t like the idea of taking a player who will ensure one of him, T-Mac, or Coker won’t be here 4 years from now, and we all know it won’t be T-Mac who gets jettisoned. So either believe in Coker or don’t, keep him and draft another position or draft a WR and trade him, don’t straddle the middle and hamstring us by leaving more holes while leaving us a huge problem a couple years from now.
    • Oh, now we are "top half?" Keep moving the goal posts. No we aren't. We don't have a surefire WR2, nor do we have a TE that we can count on to consistently make big plays. Our receiving corps is somewhat bland to be honest. It does not have enough juice. Add another playmaker, then we'll likely be top half. Our receiving corps ranked somewhere between 20 and 25 in the league depending upon who you look at. No one has us in the top half based upon last season.
    • It is hard to say--if you look back at our roster from 4 years ago...In addition, we have a ton of money going into our OL right now (which might strengthen the argument to draft a tackle now)  The average NFL career is under 4 years, but the average NFL career for first rounders is 9.3 years, so most get 2 contracts.   So having said that, I look at it as capital--if your concern (legit) becomes an issue, then you should have the same vision and trade that player and draft his replacement.  However, TMAC, Coker, and a rookie is not likely to be a problem for another 4 years--2030.   But to your point, we have a situation right now that the OL has 2 guards and a RT around or over 30.  The make about $70m per year.   I like the perspective of reality you bring, however.  Is that a factor to morgan in 2026?  
×
×
  • Create New...