Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumors

MHS831

By MHS831,
in 2015 NFL Draft

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
Just now, MHS831 said:

Explain to me why nobody is talking about the Colts taking a QB---am I missing something?  Anthony Richardson, Daniel Jones, and QB/WR Jason Bean.  If I am the Colts, I get a QB and if Sanders drops past 7 or so, the decision just got easier.

There's not really anyone in this draft that will be an improvement for them. If the Giants do not take Sanders he may not be picked until day 2. This is a really bad qb draft.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Explain to me why nobody is talking about the Colts taking a QB---am I missing something?  Anthony Richardson, Daniel Jones, and QB/WR Jason Bean.  If I am the Colts, I get a QB and if Sanders drops past 7 or so, the decision just got easier.

I got four numbers for ya, 2026.  The Colts know what this QB class is, rather is not.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

There's not really anyone in this draft that will be an improvement for them. If the Giants do not take Sanders he may not be picked until day 2. This is a really bad qb draft.

I think Richardson is a joke--I did not like him coming out of college--way over drafted--maybe developmental, but not a day 1 starter....Daniel Jones can play if given tools and time--so that may be the best play

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

I got four numbers for ya, 2026.  The Colts know what this QB class is, rather is not.

Then they will load the shed with weapons and protection this year---and watch Daniel Jones step up and become a Geno Smith---called it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
Just now, MHS831 said:

I think Richardson is a joke--I did not like him coming out of college--way over drafted--maybe developmental, but not a day 1 starter....Daniel Jones can play if given tools and time--so that may be the best play

All i know is they are not getting any help in this draft. They would be better off taking a flyer on a qb day 2 or 3 and just taking someone else in the 1st.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Then they will load the shed with weapons and protection this year---and watch Daniel Jones step up and become a Geno Smith---called it.

Possibly or they could keep him as a bridge QB.

Got your bib on to catch all the drool?

image.png.31bf473e72e3dedee41d0b6a3f049085.png

  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
11 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

All i know is they are not getting any help in this draft. They would be better off taking a flyer on a qb day 2 or 3 and just taking someone else in the 1st.

I am in the minority, but I think there are some developmental QBs in this draft that will be, quite possibly, better than the top 4 (Ward, Sanders, Dart, Milroe) IN THE LONG TERM.  They will get to sit and learn.  Many were improving and posted stats equal to or better than than the top 4.  From this list, I am fans of Howard, Ewers, and McCord.  Keep in mind that I am Terrible at picking QB talent in college for the NFL---but Will Howard is going to help someone.  McCord will help someone.  Ewers is probably a career backup, but he can play.

image.png.70b22f068315691b04269f7ecdb4842b.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
18 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I am in the minority, but I think there are some developmental QBs in this draft that will be, quite possibly, better than the top 4 (Ward, Sanders, Dart, Milroe) IN THE LONG TERM.  They will get to sit and learn.  Many were improving and posted stats equal to or better than than the top 4.  From this list, I am fans of Howard, Ewers, and McCord.  Keep in mind that I am Terrible at picking QB talent in college for the NFL---but Will Howard is going to help someone.  McCord will help someone.  Ewers is probably a career backup, but he can play.

image.png.70b22f068315691b04269f7ecdb4842b.png

I also like Rourke from above. Now, I am not talking about the next franchise messiah--I am talking about a guy you can develop as your 3rd qb and protect him on the PS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Possibly or they could keep him as a bridge QB.

Got your bib on to catch all the drool?

image.png.31bf473e72e3dedee41d0b6a3f049085.png

You know, taking a QB this year (to be the starter) means you are likely not drafting one in 2026.  It seems teams like the Colts, Giants, Raiders, Saints, Steelers (possibly) are positioning themselves to take a QB next year.  I don't know what Cleveland is doing--Pickett?  Stephanski can't assume he has 2 years to turn it around.  I do have a brother in law who lives in Columbus--a chiropractor and OSU grad, and he tells me that people were talking about Howard to the Browns in round 2 or so, but that is when everyone was giddy about winning the title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
grimesgoat Experienced

grimesgoat

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Explain to me why nobody is talking about the Colts taking a QB---am I missing something?  Anthony Richardson, Daniel Jones, and QB/WR Jason Bean.  If I am the Colts, I get a QB and if Sanders drops past 7 or so, the decision just got easier.

If they move up for anyone, I bet its Warren.  Jones and Warren could be something.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, MHS831 said:

You know, taking a QB this year (to be the starter) means you are likely not drafting one in 2026.  It seems teams like the Colts, Giants, Raiders, Saints, Steelers (possibly) are positioning themselves to take a QB next year.  I don't know what Cleveland is doing--Pickett?  Stephanski can't assume he has 2 years to turn it around.  I do have a brother in law who lives in Columbus--a chiropractor and OSU grad, and he tells me that people were talking about Howard to the Browns in round 2 or so, but that is when everyone was giddy about winning the title.

Bingo!  After Ward, any QB taken this draft will be seen as a backup or "camp competition" to the incumbent QB.  No clear cut day 1 starters after Shedeur, not even Sanders himself.  We would be stupid not to dip our toes into that 2026 QB pool as well.  Dalton is getting ancient and if Bryce takes a step backwards, we could be right there in the conversation.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

Bingo!  After Ward, any QB taken this draft will be seen as a backup or "camp competition" to the incumbent QB.  No clear cut day 1 starters after Shedeur, not even Sanders himself.  We would be stupid not to dip our toes into that 2026 QB pool as well.  Dalton is getting ancient and if Bryce takes a step backwards, we could be right there in the conversation.

I am still reading some Giant forums where these crystal meth addicts feel that the Giants will be taking a Colorado player at #3.  I just do not see it.  Wilson is their bridge and Winston behind him is a pretty good, short-term situation.  Personally, I think Daboll is a good coach and I think Schoen is the problem--along with injuries.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PanthersNCSU
      Joe Person: Panthers will let Cade Mays test the free agent market

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      If Mays has a market, which it seems he will, he's gone.  I think we bring back Nijman for too much money to be cautious at LT, Corbett comes back cheap since he's already said he wants to live in CLT, and Christensen eventually gets re-signed with the hopes he can be depth at some point.  Draft an OT, draft a C. The OL might be rough for stretches next year, but time to get some youth there to prepare for Bryce in 2027 or the next QB. I still think we compete for the division in 2026 and can go back to the playoffs unlike the oddsmakers in Vegas, but the *real* year is 2027 IMO. Either Bryce has proven it and he's the QB looking at his 2nd contract, or we have the ready-made team for the next rookie QB or Vet we trade for. 
    • therealmjl
      Joe Person: Panthers will let Cade Mays test the free agent market

      By therealmjl · Posted

      Dumb
    • Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D.
      Joe Person: Panthers will let Cade Mays test the free agent market

      By Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. · Posted

      The Panthers are going to have a lot more flexibility in free agency than it looks like at first glance. On paper, the cap space might seem tight, but there are several obvious restructure candidates that could easily free up significant room. Between converting base salaries into signing bonuses and spreading cap hits out over future years, Carolina could realistically clear $60–80 million in additional space if they wanted to be aggressive. That kind of flexibility means they’re not stuck. They can extend key young pieces, add help along the offensive line, upgrade the defense, and still be strategic about value signings. Letting Cade Mays test the market makes sense from a leverage standpoint. If he’s willing to come back on a team-friendly deal, great, continuity on the line matters. But if his market price climbs, the Panthers should absolutely explore upgrades. The point is, this front office isn’t boxed in. With cap maneuvering and smart structuring, they have the ability to be active players in free agency rather than sitting on the sidelines like we are used too. 
×
×
  • Create New...