Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drunk Text Failure

hepcat

By hepcat,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

boo7382 Rookie

boo7382

Posted
Posted

She speaks spanish, I speak spanish, this is the text:

"Ojala que hace un buen trabajo con ese musica en el dormitorio del noche porque mi pollo esta grande"

not too proud of that one

lol god the grammar errors in here are endless

loosely translated its

I hope that (im assuming u meant hace to be "I", in the past which would be hice) I did a good job with that music in the night room b/c my chicken is huge - but estar (esta) is only for temporary situations which means that since u didnt say "es grande", you basically told her it was only big in that certain moment but it can change in the future

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
  • Author
Posted

lol god the grammar errors in here are endless

loosely translated its

I hope that (im assuming u meant hace to be "I", in the past which would be hice) I did a good job with that music in the night room b/c my chicken is huge - but estar (esta) is only for temporary situations which means that since u didnt say "es grande", you basically told her it was only big in that certain moment but it can change in the future

the grammar errors were partially intentional and partially because of drunkness. i wanted to leave an air of ambiguity in the text.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
boo7382 Rookie

boo7382

Posted
Posted

Why would you speak Spanish? Waste of a language.

Why wouldn't you? Its one of the romance languages and spoken in hundreds of places around the world. Its a beautiful language and has lots of dialects. Its also fairly easy to learn the basics until you get into grammar and translation then it gets really really difficult.

Better than French IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      About as useful as the S2
    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...