Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DONOVAN EZEIRUAKU at 8?


1989
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd rather take this guy than some workout warrior who barely never 2 sacks in an entire season let alone a game.

We shouldn't be taking any of them near or in the top 10 (save for Abdul Carter who isn't going to drop).

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Please God hurry the draft up

Just remember, after the draft we have a couple of weeks to bicker about the picks we did and didn't make any then basically nothing for months. Well, hopefully nothing. Pretty much any football related news between May and July is gonna be bad news.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I am operating under the "blind squirrel/nut" philosophy this year.  Dan can't completely blow it again can he?

Well, we don't know. But we'll know all we need to know on the 24th, including whether he and Davie boy will be here in two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just remember, after the draft we have a couple of weeks to bicker about the picks we did and didn't make any then basically nothing for months. Well, hopefully nothing. Pretty much any football related news between May and July is gonna be bad news.

I think the consensus last year was it was a weak draft class for us sans Sanders in the 4rth.  Everything else was kindof like "wtf, why?"

 

We did have a few stragglers who feel in love with xls accent and people who were not concerned about brooks.  "Beast" is the term they used to descripe him.

 

I didnt think we could do worse then fitt in the draft but morgan said hold my beer

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You are A)asking a completely moronic question and B)you were already discussing this in another thread

 

Simply googling his name and reading about him would give you a legit answer

You’re always such a dick

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Williams covered for Moore by saying they were on the wrong page about Moores specific route. Williams could have easily covered for him by saying he messed up. Suggesting only 1 route was ever intended to be a viable target is absurd.
    • I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran).  We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17.  He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28.  Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times.  Basically, he was a situational pass rusher.  He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures.  He should improve, but for now, he is what he is.  Scourton gives us hope.  For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge.  He played at a first-round draft pick level.  He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks.  For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni.   However, I see it this way:  Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level.  He is a liability, if you ask me.    Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher.  I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw.  Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable.  I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher.   Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth.  A third developmental player is not ideal.   Draft:  OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency:  Edge, possibly a WR;  re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman.  Let walk:  Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle.  I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth.  Spend it on a veteran edge.   Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range.  We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.    
    • Plays aren't designed to go to only one receiver. Qbs go through progressions for a reason. Primary or not the other routes are viable options.
×
×
  • Create New...