Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we cut Richard Marshall


panthers1789

Recommended Posts

I say cut Lucas, let Marshall have a shot at the #2 CB Spot. Last year, he filled in for Lucas I believe and did a good job. I think he'd thrive in a starter position. He'd train harder, study harder, etc. He's a GREAT tackler too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hes horrible, everyone likes to bash Lucas, but forget that Marshall gets burnt even more than Lucas.

Cut or trade Marshall, draft a corner in round 2 or round 1(if we get a 1st rounder for Peppers).

I think that you do not cut your young and taleted players. I know that Marshall regressed this past year but he still show's a lot of promise.

Until we pick a new D cordinator I would think that we wouldn't cut any of our D players, unless someone is obviously overpaid or underachieving, because you do not yet know what your DC's scheme is going to be.

What if we cut Marshall and Lucas and the new DC wants to run an aggresive bump and run with his CB's? Well Marshall and Lucas both excel as physical corners. We just screwed ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Marshall's regression had anything to do with Tim Lewis....

and yeah, I'd get rid of Lucas before Marshall. The latter is cheaper, and younger, and if someone's going to get burnt, I'd rather it be the cheaper younger one.

if he had Herm coaching him, he'd turn into a complete stud.

he makes less annually than dante wesley

lol, awesome then

He's looking to get paid this year! I can see him leaving pretty easily....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe I just read somewhere that the Rams don't do Top 30 Visits. I mean, it makes sense from the standpoint of trying to keep information close to the vest.
    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
×
×
  • Create New...