Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Next Head Coach


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Speculation from the beat writers...

Gantt: Who follows Fox (slideshow with commentary)

Person: Search Panthers history for hints

Yasinskas: Where do Panthers turn

Yasinskas: Panthers could look to college ranks

I think Steve Reed had an article about it somewhere too, but I can't find it. Anyone who has a link, feel free.

Gantt say to keep you eye on Mularkey...sure its pure speculation, but found it odd he's the only guy he made this type of comment about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I picked that up also. His closed just a few hours north on I-85!! I mean lets look at the QB play in Atl, #2 is having his best season as of yet. Came back fro behind against the Ravens which impressed me cause i counted them out that game Matt proved it he can & knows how to play the QB. From his reads how the he lets the play develop n find the open wideout. Even on the comeback his got the arm to get it only where his wideout can make a play, Is a group Mike Mularkey runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gantt say to keep you eye on Mularkey...sure its pure speculation, but found it odd he's the only guy he made this type of comment about

Gantt takes Mike Mularkey and Jeff Fisher seriously as candidates. Me? Not so much.

With that said, he knows way more about things on the inside than I do, so where he and I differ, listen to him over me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Mularkey's tenure as HC in Buffalo was a disaster, but does anyone know exactly what the problem was?

I don't follow the Bills much (and paid almost no attention to them during Mularkey's time), so don't know if the biggest problem was that the players were not that good, that the scheme didn't work, that they weren't prepared well/undisiplined, or something else. It strikes me that so many are writing him off as a HC candidate based off of his time in Buffalo, yet there are many examples of HC failures that go on to success with another team. So, I guess what I an trying to figure out is if it was simply that Mularkey wasn't ready to be a HC at that time and might be better prepared now, or if he was so lost that at best he'll likely never be anything more than a journeyman HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Mularkey's tenure as HC in Buffalo was a disaster, but does anyone know exactly what the problem was?

I don't follow the Bills much (and paid almost no attention to them during Mularkey's time), so don't know if the biggest problem was that the players were not that good, that the scheme didn't work, that they weren't prepared well/undisiplined, or something else. It strikes me that so many are writing him off as a HC candidate based off of his time in Buffalo, yet there are many examples of HC failures that go on to success with another team. So, I guess what I an trying to figure out is if it was simply that Mularkey wasn't ready to be a HC at that time and might be better prepared now, or if he was so lost that at best he'll likely never be anything more than a journeyman HC.

I read his wikepedia page, came away unimpressed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...