Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we get Luck, Bring Jake back..


Fade2BlackAndBlue

Recommended Posts

you don't bring a QB as 3rd string, 2nd string, ANY string, that can't start , its pointless

Yes you do if you don't than everyone would go out and look to put Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, and Michael Vick on their team. However, you can't afford to pay all of those players so in turn you may have to settle for someone that cannot play as well as you would like, but you know they still have the ability to throw the ball around.

And you really don't want to get into this argument when Jake Delhomme has a better QB rating than every quarterback on the Panthers roster when he is the BROWNS 3rd STRING QB.

Delhomme the Brown's third string quarterback is 2-2 as a starter.

The Panthers quarterback's 2-12. Get my drift?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes you do if you don't than everyone would go out and look to put Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, and Michael Vick on their team. However, you can't afford to pay all of those players so in turn you may have to settle for someone that cannot play as well as you would like, but you know they still have the ability to throw the ball around.

And you really don't want to get into this argument when Jake Delhomme has a better QB rating than every quarterback on the Panthers roster when he is the BROWNS 3rd STRING QB.

Delhomme the Brown's third string quarterback is 2-2 as a starter.

The Panthers quarterback's 2-12. Get my drift?

better QB rating? you are seriously going to slurp Jake Delhomme's 63.4 QB rating? get a grip man. I don't give a damn if its better it still Sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is ridiculous. nothing anyone can say will convince me that Jake can still produce. fug that. I respect Jake, and think he can work as an assistant coach or something in the future, but theres no chance im happy w/ 2 more wins and a less shitty, but still shitty QB rating. absolutely ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is ridiculous. nothing anyone can say will convince me that Jake can still produce. fug that. I respect Jake, and think he can work as an assistant coach or something in the future, but theres no chance im happy w/ 2 more wins and a less shitty, but still shitty QB rating. absolutely ridiculous.

It's useless arguing with half the people on this board because you want an NFL MVP to be a 3rd string quarterback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

disagree w/ me, but don't make up stuff. Just let it go.

Let me ask you this question are you ok with Jimmy Clausen being a back-up? If so why are you against a guy that has led the Panthers to the Super Bowl, has one a World Bowl, has been to the Pro Bowl, is the all time Carolina Panthers leader in passing attempts and passing completions, and holds a Super Bowl record for the longest touchdown pass? Jake Delhomme would not hurt anybody being a 3rd string quarterback. As we learned this year, you need a veteran quarterback at times or you are going to have a lot of ruffled feathers. This year we have no leader at quarterback and Steve Smith hates all of them. With a veteran that may not happen, Jake Delhomme has always been a peace keeper and would not hurt any part of the Panthers being a 3rd string quarterback. Jake Delhomme has a better quarterback rating than 15 other quarterbacks in the NFL and a better quarterback rating than all of the Panthers quarterbacks. He has thrown more touchdown passes than 23 quarterbacks this year. Taking that into account based on averages Delhomme would be a middle of the pack back-up in the NFL this year and a really good third string quarterback option. No matter how you look at it you cannot have three or four quarterbacks on your roster and none of them have over three years of experience in the NFL. Jake Delhomme is familiar with the team and it would save time of him getting accustom to different aspects of the Panthers organization. Just face it, there is nothing wrong with asking Delhomme to come back and be a thrid string quarterback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...