Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If the oddsmakers are correct, Denver will likely pick #1


MHS831

Recommended Posts

We're fine at WR. Using our first pick on a WR would be the dumbest thing we could do.

disagree here

Yep, we have a third round pick, a sixth round pick, a disgruntled vet, and no depth to speak of. How foolish of me.

yep, agreed, we have a 3rd round pick who is inconsistant and drops some passes. a 6th round pick who has potential, but also is inconsistant and i think is best as a 3rd reciever and Steve Smith who is usually taken out of the play, yep, seems fine to me. I guess if Luck or Newton (whoever the panthers take at QB) struggle as rookies and win 3 games, we will hear names like Matt Barkley or Terrelle Pyror next year. sorry, but reciever is a major issue with the panthers, but Luck has franchise quarterback potential which is why he is and should be talked about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers cannot beat the Falcons. Panthers cannot beat the Falcons backups. Atlanta could take their practice squad guys, make them all starters with the backups, and they would still beat the Panthers.

The number 1 pick is ours. You guys aren't real fans if you think otherwise!

you've got to be kidding me! real fans know that their team can beat the backups for a team, the panthers are 2 and 12 and bad yes, but we arent so bad that John Parker Wilson can drive on us and score 20 or more points. if they lose to the falcons, it will be either, A) because the Falcons have the starters in the whole game or B) the starters are in for half the game and they put up 21 points and Carolina has 0 and have to come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is really not true. Oddsmakers set unbiased odds which the casinos then use. The odds set by the oddsmakers are considered the best odds to get equal money on both sides of the bet.

Occasionally in huge matches (superbowl, USA vs England soccer) the line may be fudged because there is the assumption that huge amounts of people will be making illogical bets...i.e. betting on the home country. But for your run of the mill week 16 NFL game the lines are based on data.

The odds you see in vegas would be the best statistic to use by far in determining a team's odds to win.

I disagree. Because the lines move as bets are placed to entice folks to bet on way or another depending on how heavily one side of a given line has been bet. If it were the odds of one team winning vs another the line would never move. They are not interested in predicting the outcome per say... they are interested in getting folks to bet in a situation where they have the best chance of losing that bet. You can pick the correct team to win or lose and still lose the bet. Thats why they have a line in the fist place. If it were just straight pickem vegas wouldnt make money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a great example of a whole bunch of words supporting a completely false thesis

I am amazed that you recognized "a whole bunch of words." You, I noticed, did not provide a thesis. If the Falcons start their second teams and rest the starters--like New Orleans did last year--Oddsmakers would have to adjust and would give the advantage to the Panthers. If there are no upsets, Denver would get the pick. Do you understand the hypothetical aspect of this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. Because the lines move as bets are placed to entice folks to bet on way or another depending on how heavily one side of a given line has been bet. If it were the odds of one team winning vs another the line would never move. They are not interested in predicting the outcome per say... they are interested in getting folks to bet in a situation where they have the best chance of losing that bet. You can pick the correct team to win or lose and still lose the bet. Thats why they have a line in the fist place. If it were just straight pickem vegas wouldnt make money.

You are wrong. Trying one more time.

Lines are set by oddsmakers who use huge amounts of data, not public perception, to set the lines. Casinos then buy and use those lines and, as you state, may move them to get equal money bet. They also may not move them at all and simply lay off the excess.

However, lines really don't move that much and often not at all. Because usually the oddsmakers are pretty damn good. Occasionally on big games or large lines (like the game tomorrow actually) the line will bounce around a little. Or when huge news comes out during the week. And even then its a point or two usually less. Not enough to affect the "odds" significantly.

Vegas odds are generally the best information you will have to determine the "odds" of a certain team winning (you can just use the moneyline and adjust for the house take for a good estimate of a certain team winning )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see the oddsmakers picking us to win in Atlanta even if they are resting their starters. That doesn't mean we couldn't win, but I don't see them picking it. If thats the case, then they wouldn't be correct would they?

I think it may not open the way I speculate, but if people suspect that ATL is going to rest their big dogs, I can see the odds swinging rather dramatically in the Panthers favor as bets start coming in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am amazed that you recognized "a whole bunch of words." You, I noticed, did not provide a thesis. If the Falcons start their second teams and rest the starters--like New Orleans did last year--Oddsmakers would have to adjust and would give the advantage to the Panthers. If there are no upsets, Denver would get the pick. Do you understand the hypothetical aspect of this?

Here is your thesis:

If the oddsmakers are correct, Denver will likely pick #1

Its wrong, at least the last 5 words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here’s a summary of the JJ and Luke podcast transcript. Opening / Bryce Young Fifth-Year Option     •    JJ: Breaking news — Panthers picked up Bryce Young’s fifth-year option at $25.9M, guaranteed, coming in 2027. Combined with his 2025 salary of ~$6M, that’s $31M over two years — called it a “no-brainer.”     •    Luke: Enthusiastic about the move. Highlighted Bryce’s improving TD/INT ratios (11/10 → 15/9 → 23/11) and the value of entering year three with Dave Canales. Noted $25M is a bargain relative to the $60M top of market. Luke’s Personal Update — Charlotte Christian Football     •    Luke: Working with Charlotte Christian school football program, which hired a new head coach. Coaches include Greg Olsen, Luke, and Greg’s dad Chris Olsen (a New Jersey State coaching Hall of Famer).     •    JJ: Jokingly quipped that Charlotte Christian’s coaching staff is “the world’s greatest” — a Fox analyst, a Hall of Famer, and the best Panthers RB ever — all coaching middle school football.     •    Luke: Praised Chris Olsen’s deep football knowledge spanning decades and his ability to connect with kids. Round 1, Pick 19 — Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia     •    JJ: Panthers were on the clock and submitted their pick almost immediately — a sign of confidence and preparation. Freeling is 6’7”, 320 lbs, played in the SEC in a pro-style system.     •    Luke: Loved the pick. Emphasized you can never have too many quality offensive linemen. Noted Freeling’s size, athleticism, and arm length as key traits. Said the pick also reflects team’s philosophy of drafting great people, not just great players.     •    JJ: Noted reporter Darren Gantt compared Freeling favorably to Jordan Gross — bigger, heavier, and faster — as a potential franchise left tackle.     •    Luke: Pointed out that young players like Freeling still have physical development ahead of them, comparing the trajectory to Christian McCaffrey’s growth from age 20 onward. Round 2, Pick 49 — Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech     •    JJ: Panthers traded up from 51 to 49 (pick swap with Minnesota) to grab Hunter. Played audio from Panthers area scout Kaden McLuhan, who scouted Hunter.     •    Scout Kaden McLuhan (audio): Said Hunter’s size is immediately striking, and that everyone around him spoke glowingly about his character, energy, and love for the game.     •    Luke: Praised Hunter as a massive (6’3”, 320 lbs, ~34” arms) two-gap nose tackle who fits perfectly in the Evero defense. Compared his prospect profile to Akiem Hicks. Said having Derek Brown, Bobby Brown, Derrick Brown, Terson Wharton, and now Hunter creates varied body types that stress offensive linemen.     •    JJ: Noted Hunter ranked third among all prospects in run-stuff rate and sixth in interior pass-rush win rate — addressing a perception that he couldn’t rush the passer. Rounds 3–7 Highlights     •    Luke: Highlighted WR Brazle (3rd round, 6’4”, 437 speed, 1,000+ yards at Tennessee) as the vertical threat the offense needed. Also praised OL Sam Heck (5th round) as a technically sound player whose “short arms” caused him to fall but who has proven himself.     •    Luke: Mentioned CB Will Lee (6’1”, 33” arms) fits the Panthers’ DB prototype — big, long corners.     •    Luke: Praised S/LB hybrid Zaki Wheatley (5th round, 6’3”) as a big nickel similar to Trayvon Merek.     •    Luke: Excited about the linebacker competition between Devin Lloyd, Trevvin Wallace, and Claudin Cherless.     •    JJ: Noted Panthers had the #1 “steal/overreach” rating in the entire draft — drafting players lower than consensus big boards projected. Around the League     •    Luke: Admitted being “a little jealous” that the Miami Dolphins drafted LB Jacob Rodriguez (Luke’s favorite LB in the draft). Has personal connections to Miami’s coaching staff (Jeff Hafley, DC Shawn Dugen — a childhood teammate).     •    Luke: Also noted Miami’s selection of OT/G Kaden Proctor out of Alabama, who will likely move to guard. League Trends — Bigger Tight Ends / 12 & 13 Personnel     •    JJ: Observed the NFL saw its highest run rate in ~11 years (~52%) and a notable pivot toward big blocking tight ends in this draft.     •    Luke: Explained the cyclical nature of NFL offense/defense evolution — as defenses get smaller to match spread offenses, teams counter with bigger personnel (12/13 formations), which then forces defenses to get bigger at the nickel/“big nickel” spot. Called it an ongoing arms race.
    • Dan Vladar is their best player and that is going to be the difference in the series 
×
×
  • Create New...