Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Something that bothers me about Luck


rmoneyg35

Recommended Posts

It is?

Manning - Tennessee

Brady- Michigan

Rodgers- Cal

Cutler- Vandy-SEC

Ryan- BC

Freeman- Kansas ST

Mike Vick- VT

Sanchez- USC

Cassell- USC

Palmer- USC

Campbell- Auburn

Brees- Purdue

Eli- Ole Miss

VT and BC are in the same conference as NC State. which the poster said was weaker than the Pac 10. USC and Cal are both in the Pac-10 which is the same as stanford. So by listing players consisting of majority Pac-10 and ACC players, you don't really make a point since those conferences were said to be weak in Strength of Schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VT and BC are in the same conference as NC State. which the poster said was weaker than the Pac 10. USC and Cal are both in the Pac-10 which is the same as stanford. So by listing players consisting of majority Pac-10 and ACC players, you don't really make a point since those conferences were said to be weak in Strength of Schedule.

So tell me, which conferences are good? And you cant judge the conference from the players I mentioned when they played in it, based off of this year, like everyone is doing.

And I've named more then just players from the ACC and PAC 10, why didn't you address that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

add to the fact that is arm strength is just 'above average". isnt that what they said about jimmy?

Actually, he has excellent arm strength. It's one of the assets people talk about when evaluating him. I think you're misinterpreting them saying he doesn't have a cannon, with his arm strength is only average or a little above. The fact is that his arm strength is probably on par with Manning, Brady and most other top end QB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1st round picks

JaWalrus Russell-LSU-SEC

Jason Campbell(semi bust)-Auburn-SEC

Rex Grossman(semi bust)-Florida-SEC

Tim Couch-Kentucky-SEC

Heath Shuler-Tennessee-SEC

2nd round picks

Chad Henne(semi-bust)-Big 10

Drew Stanton-Michigan State-Big 10

Quincy Carter-Georgia-SEC

Tony Banks-Michigan State-Big 10

Tony Sacca-Penn State-Big 10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So tell me, which conferences are good? And you cant judge the conference from the players I mentioned when they played in it, based off of this year, like everyone is doing.

And I've named more then just players from the ACC and PAC 10, why didn't you address that?

Regardless, by listing all those players and their respective teams you didn't do them any justice either since the whole argument was strength of schedule and whatever conference they're in takes a huge part in their strength of schedule. in the SEC you see a lot of winning records, they win their nonconference games typically, whereas the ACC doesn't.

Their strength distributions also matter

the Pac-10, Big 10 and Big East are all top heavy. Once they've beaten the other 1 or 2 good teams, they're set for the year. there's also the lack of a championship game. You might not be seeing Oregon in the BCS Title if they had to play Stanford again.

the SEC and ACC and Big 12 have better distributions however the magnitude of the distributions aren't the same. It's tougher to win in these conferences. Could be an upset any week.

While the schedules and strengths of individual schools may not be the same year in and year out, the trends in the conferences are.

Actually i forgot what your point was compared to my point a while ago.. and i'm on too crappy of internet to open another tab and find out.. so i'm gonna just post this and hope it goes along with what i was supposed to be thinking.. for some reason i think i was just pointing out that the other guy was saying that the pac10 and acc are weak because he listed qbs from those conferences there and you brought up players from the same conferences saying they're strong so it's like, you can't really argue opinion using opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strength of conference is over-rated, IMO

Flacco played at Delaware

Roethlisberger played at Miami(Ohio)

Rivers played at NCState which is weaker than the PAC10

Favre played at SoMiss

Tom Brady couldn't beat out Drew Henson at Michigan

Joe Montana was primarily a backup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It’s one thing if we’re converting the salaries of a Turk Wharton or Tommy Tremble.  This is Derrick Brown.  He’ll end up with a whole new contract in a couple years anyway.  And he’ll earn it too.
    • My general thoughts on the roster as it stands right now:  - Most interesting positions to watch: TE, NT, WR.  - If we add a TE I feel like it'll be a bigger name FA or Kenyon Sadiq in the 1st round. I don't expect us to take a TE that early with our need at tackle, though, so it's likely one of the top FA TEs or we ride with Tremble/Sanders/Evans again. Signing a mid-level FA or drafting another mid-round TE isn't going to help us at this point. We have three of those guys already.  - I don't buy the 1st/2nd round WR hype. I do think we will sign someone to play the slot because XL is... not good. John Metchie, Juan Jennings and Calvin Austin would make sense if the money does.  - NT could be interesting because I don't get the sense that they view Bobby Brown as a true starter. This could be a position we look to add a veteran starter at or possibly take one early in the draft.  - Devin Lloyd was a huge addition, but we need another starter beside him. I fully expect us to go after one in the 2nd round. Jacob Rodriguez makes a ton of sense here.  - The Luke Fortner signing gives us a veteran fallback at center this season. I don't expect he'll end up being our long-term starter, but it's likely he will at least begin the year atop the depth chart. Even if we draft a center it's unlikely that player ends up being a day-one starter. But I think right now we're likely targeting a center in the 3rd-4th round as that seems to be where the value is.  - We have no punter on the roster. Interested to see if we sign a veteran or go the draft/UDFA route.  - The OT situation is pretty bleak. I now fully expect us to take a tackle at #19, but even after the Stone Forsythe signing we also need better depth there. Brady Christensen would be an idea re-signing; I also like Jamaree Salyer from the Chargers as a younger option that still has room to develop.  - Guard depth is also lacking. Again, having a versatile backup like Brady Christensen would go a long way toward having some security for our entire OL, but even if he comes back we should add another veteran backup, IMO.  - I assume Lathan Ransom would be the starting FS if we played today, but we know Evero loves him some Nick Scott so I won't be surprised if/when we re-sign him. He's basically the defensive version of David Moore, unfortunately. Ideally we'd look to add a true FS, but I don't get the sense that is a big priority at the moment.  - Nickel corner is a need and I fully expect us to sign someone in the next few days to upgrade over Chau Smith-Wade. Long-term, I won't be shocked if we go CB earlier in the draft than people might expect given Mike Jackson's contract expires after this year.  - I wouldn't be shocked to see us sign a RB. Sean Tucker or Brian Robinson could be interesting. We know what Chuba can do, but Jonathon Brooks has to be considered a question mark at this point.
    • Considering the Raiders and Crosby’s disagreements about his health late last year and the Ravens’ history of being an extremely well run organization I lean towards the Ravens not being in the wrong here
×
×
  • Create New...