Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently, No Name Change Coming


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/12/30/1942865/observations-research-shows-little.html

This is all that was written about it, so I guess that's all that needs to be said?

As much as some of you would prefer a name change from the Bobcats, that isn't a widespread concern, based on the team's recent market research. Pete Guelli, who heads the Bobcats' marketing, told me the team's recent market study showed no groundswell for a name change.

Read more: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/12/30/1942865/observations-research-shows-little.html#ixzz19bITangU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, guys no name change. But if you're feeling nostalgic, the Hornets are still around and are being led by David Stern now. With concerns over them having to move from NO, Im sure the "name change" folks would be welcomed with open arms in that fanbase. Then you could pull for a b-ball team named the HORNETS! Muggsy Bogues and Kelly Tripucka might even walk thru that door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As i said in another name change thread, I would have liked to see the Hornets name again just for the historical significance of it. When i see the name Bobcats i don't think of Bob Johnson. I never have. I'm glad they researched the possibility of it. At least they are showing responsiveness to the fans.

Go Bobcats!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...