Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fair or Foul for Phil Jackson to call out Kobe??


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

“We get behind early on in the third quarter on some stupid plays — poor passing, poor transition defense — and then Kobe has to screw up the game and start energizing the team by going one-on-one and that takes the rest of the guys out as a consequence,” Jackson told reporters. “That didn’t bring us back in, but it did give us a little run, we got the game back a little bit but we couldn’t sustain it and we just went right back and made the same mistakes again.”

Jackson also said some nameless Lakers were, “Trying to do too much with the basketball … Teams are double-teaming, coming to help, we have to move the ball.” Jackson added, “The game got to a point where we didn’t use our strength, which is our inside players.”

http://dimemag.com/2011/01/kobe-screwed-up-the-game-says-phil-jackson-after-lakers-loss/

Of course everyone is subject to criticisms, and Phil has been there, done that, and wrote the book. But is this fair or foul in your opinion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phil Jackson is just saying what anyone who has a lick of knowledge about basketball has always known. He cost the Lakers possibly 2-4 championships if not more. No reason the Lakers couldn't win before Phil got there other than Kobe going one on five in the playoffs against the Jazz. Then he ran Shaq out of town.

He's a great ball player and has plenty of rings, but I'll remember him for jacking up three pointers against the Jazz when being double teamed as much as anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phil Jackson is just saying what anyone who has a lick of knowledge about basketball has always known. He cost the Lakers possibly 2-4 championships if not more. No reason the Lakers couldn't win before Phil got there other than Kobe going one on five in the playoffs against the Jazz. Then he ran Shaq out of town.

He's a great ball player and has plenty of rings, but I'll remember him for jacking up three pointers against the Jazz when being double teamed as much as anything else.

so what?? he was young as fug. What was Jordan doing when he was 21? playing college ball 22-23? Superstar youngster that was notorious for being a ballhog. Look at his body of work and not the playoff series when he was basically a college kid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

happens almost every season...just one of Jackson's ways of inspiring his players!

guys got a closet full of rings, pretty sure none of us are in a position to question his ways!!!!!

Expect to see Kobe bear down soon and start stringing together some 30 point games.

Phil ain't no dummy.

Problem for the Lakers is this point of the season is boring as hell as the only thing to play for is Home Court. Guess what? No one in the West is going to catch San Antonio for that right. Another 40 games before any of this means anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phil Jackson is just saying what anyone who has a lick of knowledge about basketball has always known. He cost the Lakers possibly 2-4 championships if not more. No reason the Lakers couldn't win before Phil got there other than Kobe going one on five in the playoffs against the Jazz. Then he ran Shaq out of town.

He's a great ball player and has plenty of rings, but I'll remember him for jacking up three pointers against the Jazz when being double teamed as much as anything else.

Shaq ran himself out of town rolling into camp out of shape every year and looking like he spent the offseason eating Bon Bons. Management got tired of paying $20 million forthat poo and made a choice between the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...