Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mortensen Trashes Richardson/Luck to Panthers on Mike and Mike


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Just said JR is in bad mood about the CBA and made you scratch your head with some of the things he said yesterday.

Was talking about Harbaugh possibilities and then it led into Luck's situation... He then said if there is no CBA in place and no rookie scale, Luck should get 50+ mil and said he's not sure JR is willing to pay that much.

Also said Mularkey could end up being interviewed by us but he's too expensive for our taste, lol.

Well, that presser worked...

I'm starting to feel Luck may not want to come out upon further consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh, Mortensen is wrong.

The CBA expires in March, and rookies are not signed until June-July.

Rookie wage scale will be in place by the time they are signed.

and if I am wrong, good for us. That is a guarantees that Luck will come out. No way he gives aways 25-30 million dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IM also hearing tho that the rookie wage scale in the new CBA will be implemented for the 2012 draft.

could be wrong tho.

If you're right then that may even seal the deal if Harbaugh stayed at Stanford (which I see very unlikely)....good research Salty, if that was research.....:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he will pay the #1 pick. That is why he said he would stay there and not trade down

Yeah, but we're in a sad situation if this is the point we're at -

"Don't think they want to pay the #1 pick, sure-fire lock, franchise QB..."

"Mike Mularkey is too expensive for their taste..."

MIKE F'ING MULARKEY? TOO EXPENSIVE?

I could understand the Harbaugh deal, but that would be ridiculous.

I just hope for our sake these media reports aren't influencing Luck or any other potential candidates for positions with the organization... Hopefully they talk to JR themselves... Wait... Nevermind. Scratch that, I'd rather they not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richardson Paid Delhomme, possibly worst QB in NFL, what $13 Million this season to not even play for us?

Geez, the Panthers have been a complete disaster in PR area because of letting go all our Vets, not resigning Peppers and hanging Fox out to dry.

They should've been aware of this, and to save face atleast sign a couple decent Free Agents last year. Branding matters, if the national Perception of the Panthers is the one Luck now holds it may keep him in school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're right then that may even seal the deal if Harbaugh stayed at Stanford (which I see very unlikely)....good research Salty' date=' if that was research.....:D[/quote']

I read it in an article. Almost as much research as listening to morten anderson so take that with a grain of salt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s overthrown WRs numerous times deep,I don’t think his arm strength there is a problem, def seems to be and issue in the 20-30 yard range, I don’t see a lot of outbreaking routes being completed, whether that’s due to his lack of ability to drive the ball to the outside hash or our WRs, especially XL cornering at the top of there routes. regardless of his weaknesses, the question is can a team be built around him to mask them, or can he overcome those weaknesses and adapt. I know it’s beating a dead horse, but something big is missing from Bryce’s qb play that’s leading to so many sub 200 yard passing games, all signs lead to a physical trait that’s the cause of this, wether it’s arm strength or his height  
    • That was fully intentional, because something people who engage in hyperbole can't stand is to be systematically told why and how they don't have a clue. It's the prevalence of this farcical idea that everyone's opinions are valid and the more impassioned they are about them, the more valid they are. And the point of the post wasn't merely to cut the knees of the exaggerators, but to illustrate why it shouldn't seem miraculous that someone like Mayfield and Darnold could come through Charlotte and fail and then suddenly seem much more successful elsewhere, when the reality is that there's far more to being successful at that position than one's own talent. It's also why young quarterbacks like Caleb Williams and Cam Ward deserve much longer leashes to determine their long-term viability and not be written off immediately, because the circumstances surrounding them are hardly conducive to success.
    • I think at some point you top out what God gave you.  He can use leverage via his mechanics to maximize what he has and When he pays attention to it the throws are better.    IMO as a layman a lot of it is what kind of ‘headroom’ you have. The guys who are gifted don’t have to use maximum effort to get good results and stay within themselves but they have it in reserve. They can do an arm throw for substantial distance without max effort.    I think what we may be seeing with these ‘lasers’ is a throw that Bryce puts the max effort into and does his mechanics right and has his base right and it works together.    To get to the payoff here, I think his best velocity throws take dall that whereas  a naturally gifted guy doesn’t need to go full effort to get that same velocity. I have said this three or four times over the years and it never gets picked up on but the accuracy is more consistent with an easier motion and max effort can produce less predictable location. It is a baseball pitcher thing but it applies to throwing a pass too. It isn’t that you can’t make an accurate throw with full effort it is just not as reliably accurate to the same degree. Someone said something about his pro day and that is where I saw it too. He took a little extra step on the deep throws. Some call it a hitch but I don’t see it that way because I don’t see it on shorter throws. He does it trying to get distance. I saw that and just wanted no part of it at 1.1 . That is not tne characteristic of a 1.1 passer.  He should have been at best, late first  I had him second day. Of course I am no one and certainly not a pro evaluator, it is just that he was so easy to suss out. It is kind of in your face obvious.  They must have thought they could fix him. Changing a lifelong throwing motion with the footwork tied into it is not fuging easy. Anyone that had decent success with ‘their’ way and tried to change it to get more, can tell you that.     
×
×
  • Create New...