Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mortensen Trashes Richardson/Luck to Panthers on Mike and Mike


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Just said JR is in bad mood about the CBA and made you scratch your head with some of the things he said yesterday.

Was talking about Harbaugh possibilities and then it led into Luck's situation... He then said if there is no CBA in place and no rookie scale, Luck should get 50+ mil and said he's not sure JR is willing to pay that much.

Also said Mularkey could end up being interviewed by us but he's too expensive for our taste, lol.

Well, that presser worked...

I'm starting to feel Luck may not want to come out upon further consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh, Mortensen is wrong.

The CBA expires in March, and rookies are not signed until June-July.

Rookie wage scale will be in place by the time they are signed.

and if I am wrong, good for us. That is a guarantees that Luck will come out. No way he gives aways 25-30 million dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IM also hearing tho that the rookie wage scale in the new CBA will be implemented for the 2012 draft.

could be wrong tho.

If you're right then that may even seal the deal if Harbaugh stayed at Stanford (which I see very unlikely)....good research Salty, if that was research.....:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he will pay the #1 pick. That is why he said he would stay there and not trade down

Yeah, but we're in a sad situation if this is the point we're at -

"Don't think they want to pay the #1 pick, sure-fire lock, franchise QB..."

"Mike Mularkey is too expensive for their taste..."

MIKE F'ING MULARKEY? TOO EXPENSIVE?

I could understand the Harbaugh deal, but that would be ridiculous.

I just hope for our sake these media reports aren't influencing Luck or any other potential candidates for positions with the organization... Hopefully they talk to JR themselves... Wait... Nevermind. Scratch that, I'd rather they not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richardson Paid Delhomme, possibly worst QB in NFL, what $13 Million this season to not even play for us?

Geez, the Panthers have been a complete disaster in PR area because of letting go all our Vets, not resigning Peppers and hanging Fox out to dry.

They should've been aware of this, and to save face atleast sign a couple decent Free Agents last year. Branding matters, if the national Perception of the Panthers is the one Luck now holds it may keep him in school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're right then that may even seal the deal if Harbaugh stayed at Stanford (which I see very unlikely)....good research Salty' date=' if that was research.....:D[/quote']

I read it in an article. Almost as much research as listening to morten anderson so take that with a grain of salt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...