Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

McShay Says Gabbert is a Possibility for Us Now, as Well as Fairley or Bowers


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Said QB is an obvious position of need, and Clausen is what he expected he was, "Not NFL ready..." and didn't know if he would ever be a viable NFL starter. Said QB is the obvious, biggest need, and Gabbert is one of the most underrated players in the draft and spoke highly of him.

Said if we weren't going at QB then DL was probably the next most important area of need and Fairley was a better fit for immediate need than Bowers would be.

Cam Newton isn't even in his Top 10 and he never even mentioned him.

For the record, I think Gabbert might surprise but generally isn't anything to brag about, but otherwise, I think all these guys will be solid role players at best. Newton has potential, but I think has work to do and several question marks.

McShay is an assclown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the life of me i've never seen Gabbert play or even heard of him til this season.

I will not comment on his ability seeing as how i watch few college football games outside the SEC/ACC. Gabbert maybe a great talent, IDK but Quarterbacks who come out of nowhere after one season worry me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fairley, Bowers or Green would be my choice. Can't go wrong with any of them, imo.

Fairley would help solidify the middle. Bowers would be an awesome compliment, him on one end and Johnson on the other. Green could replace a Smith that may or may not want to be traded.

I wouldn't be surprised with one of those 3 guys being our choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're not waiting for Luck.

Screw that man.

If a chance comes along to improve our team this offseason, we take it.

Screw Luck, and the overrated team he came in on.

At least that's my take on it.

LOL at Stanford being overrated. They might be the best team in the country.

I'll chalk that up to the bitterness in side you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're not waiting for Luck.

Screw that man.

If a chance comes along to improve our team this offseason, we take it.

Screw Luck, and the overrated team he came in on.

At least that's my take on it.

this team just is not ready to compete with the big boys, were two years off

2011 offseason- Defense defense defense

2012 offseason- Offense Offense Offense

(and yes im still pissed about luck)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL at Stanford being overrated. They might be the best team in the country.

I'll chalk that up to the bitterness in side you.

Stanford is not the best team in the country.

Oregon, Auburn, Bama at their best, TCU perhaps, along with a couple others I'd take over Stanford.

And so what if it is?

He's not on this team. He's likely not gonna be on this team. He'll likely play for another team, so he's the enemy.

I hope he freaking sucks. Screw him and over his overrated coach.

Screw 'em all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stanford is not the best team in the country.

Oregon, Auburn, Bama at their best, TCU perhaps, along with a couple others I'd take over Stanford.

And so what if it is?

He's not on this team. He's likely not gonna be on this team. He'll likely play for another team, so he's the enemy.

I hope he freaking sucks. Screw him and over his overrated coach.

Screw 'em all.

actually, if we pick up something thats not a qb, and buffalo takes mallet, we are the frontrunners for luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stanford is not the best team in the country.

Oregon, Auburn, Bama at their best, TCU perhaps, along with a couple others I'd take over Stanford.

And so what if it is?

He's not on this team. He's likely not gonna be on this team. He'll likely play for another team, so he's the enemy.

I hope he freaking sucks. Screw him and over his overrated coach.

Screw 'em all.

someones obviously mad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You guys remember when the narrative on here was that Bryce would be chronically injured in the NFL due to his size and Anthony Richardson would be super durable due to his? You remember when the narrative was that Bryce was physically incapable of throwing a ball further than 20 yards in the NFL? You remember “I’ll stop complaining when he throws for more than 200 yards and looks like an NFL quarterback”? You remember when 60 sacks was his fault and not the offensive line, slow WRs, and terrible scheme? Pepperidge Farm remembers. It will always be something for some people. Whatever insanity they come up with will be quickly dropped to move on to the next thing. Bryce could have an MVP Super Bowl winning season and they would complain that we can’t run the tush push with him. It will always be something.
    • For the Panthers fans still low on Bryce and demanding that he be a top-10 QB this upcoming season: What stat(s) will you need to see? Not the vibe you want, but rather what does he need to be top-10 in specifically? Passing yards? Completion percentage? Win-loss record? PFF grades? EPA? CPOE? Asking because this was asked before and... well... it ended up that the folks down on him didn't care about the numbers as much as they cared that they just couldn't get passed his size regardless of how he performed. It would be nice to get a straight-forward answer to that without the usual deflection and redirecting.
×
×
  • Create New...