Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If AJ Green is the Pick...


chknwing

Recommended Posts

Picking Green would be idiotic.

We would have used the following picks on WR in the last two years

From 2010 draft 78, 89, 198

From 2011 draft 1, 33 (Edwards trade)

You simply can't do that. If you guys want a reciever, we are going to have to add a vet through Free Agency.

So, Armanti in two drafts?

It really looks like your trying to manipulate the conversation to your liking..

You have to take Green. With our poor offense, you have to.

Neither Gettis nor LaFell possess the potential Green does, which exceeds that of others in his class like Fairley or Peterson.

If you want a DT or CB, we are going to have to add a vet through Free Agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picking Green would be idiotic.

We would have used the following picks on WR in the last two years

From 2010 draft 78, 89, 198

From 2011 draft 1, 33 (Edwards trade)

You simply can't do that. If you guys want a reciever, we are going to have to add a vet through Free Agency.

should have done that with Bolden or Marshall... Green could be better than both for a lot longer.. I say go for it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, Armanti in two drafts?

It really looks like your trying to manipulate the conversation to your liking..

You have to take Green. With our poor offense, you have to.

Neither Gettis nor LaFell possess the potential Green does, which exceeds that of others in his class like Fairley or Peterson.

If you want a DT or CB, we are going to have to add a vet through Free Agency.

No way, a rookie WR is gonna have to deal with our inability at QB, which is gonna limit his "greatness". A rookie DT or CB doesn't rely on anyone except themselves to play at a good level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way, a rookie WR is gonna have to deal with our inability at QB, which is gonna limit his "greatness". A rookie DT or CB doesn't rely on anyone except themselves to play at a good level.

False.

And the gameplan here is to bring in someone to replace Clausen at QB.

If you can get a Kolb or a Hasselbeck, Green will be just fine and will contribute quite nicely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

False.

And the gameplan here is to bring in someone to replace Clausen at QB.

If you can get a Kolb or a Hasselbeck, Green will be just fine and will contribute quite nicely.

I'm saying they don't have to rely on anyone to get them the ball in order to be successful. And we aren't getting kolb, and I doubt Seattle lets Hasselback walk.

The only picks that make sense at number 1 are Newton, Fairly, and Peterson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, Armanti in two drafts?

It really looks like your trying to manipulate the conversation to your liking..

You have to take Green. With our poor offense, you have to.

Neither Gettis nor LaFell possess the potential Green does, which exceeds that of others in his class like Fairley or Peterson.

If you want a DT or CB, we are going to have to add a vet through Free Agency.

Armanti cost us a great pick this year, so yeah, he should count double, just as our Everette Brown pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bull poo! Put down the damn madden controller and learn about real football. Like Ray Lewis says 'Real football, not fantasy football'. you NEVER take a WR there unless you like being the Detroit Lions.

I'm pretty sure madden doesn't have a controller made just for it but whatever floats your trolly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm saying they don't have to rely on anyone to get them the ball in order to be successful. And we aren't getting kolb, and I doubt Seattle lets Hasselback walk.

The only picks that make sense at number 1 are Newton, Fairly, and Peterson.

This team is going to pursue another alternative at the QB position this year.

In the likely event they don't draft one because none of the clowns left at QB impress them, they'll have to address the position through another means.

Pull your head out of your arse.

If we waste a pick on any of those clowns, we'd be hurting ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team is going to pursue another alternative at the QB position this year.

In the likely event they don't draft one because none of the clowns left at QB impress them, they'll have to address the position through another means.

Pull your head out of your arse.

If we waste a pick on any of those clowns, we'd be hurting ourselves.

And you know this how?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you know this how?

Because Green's potential outweighs that of Fairley and Peterson's.

And when you consider the fact that there are more defensive prospects that are likely to enter FA than there are WR prospects, I think Green has to be the pick.

The only other position we should consider taking is QB, which is a high risk (high reward) move, while taking Green is a safe (also high reward) move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because Green's potential outweighs that of Fairley and Peterson's.

And when you consider the fact that there are more defensive prospects that are likely to enter FA than there are WR prospects, I think Green has to be the pick.

The only other position we should consider taking is QB, which is a high risk (high reward) move, while taking Green is a safe (also high reward) move.

No draft pick is a safe pick, pull your head outta your arse. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, Armanti in two drafts?

It really looks like your trying to manipulate the conversation to your liking..

You have to take Green. With our poor offense, you have to.

Neither Gettis nor LaFell possess the potential Green does, which exceeds that of others in his class like Fairley or Peterson.

If you want a DT or CB, we are going to have to add a vet through Free Agency.

I'm not manipulating anything. We used a third on Armanti Edwards and gave up a second.

In all sense of the word, Armanti Edwards was drafted using a 2010 3rd, and a 2011 2nd. Is that not correct?

And I agree with the poster that said we should have done that with Marshall or Boldin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the holes this team has I really wouldn't mind trading down to like 5 or 6 and picking up a second rounder. However, I wouldn't be disappointed if we drafted Green.

A wide-reciever corps of Green, Smitty, LaFell, and Gettis + Armanti if he can get out onto the field would be very very nice. If we sign a vet qb and keep pickles and Pike you never know what could happen.

Man just imagine for a minute Clausen had panned out, oh wait then we wouldn't have the number one pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They definitely shied away in part of Deion and the hype machine. Hell, even the Browns' football people didn't want him. Just look at the faces in that room as the pick was being announced. LOL  But honestly, Shedeur checks all the boxes of guys who put up big numbers in college but don't project well to the NFL. QB friendly pass happy offense. Bad defense that forces the team to chase points. Weak schedule. Marginal measurables and talent. I mean, let's be honest, what plus physical traits does he have at the NFL level? Size? Below average. Arm? Below average. Mobility? Average. Then you add in the Travis Hunter factor of an all world athlete being your primary target. Finally, you have to look at his playing style. He basically plays like Johnny Manziel. There's pretty much only two guys who have made that style of play work for them in the modern era and that's Favre and Mahomes and they both have absolute cannon arms. Caleb Williams has that cannon and he's still struggling to make it work. Yeah, the Deion circus hurt him but when you objectively look at his NFL projection then combine it with the reports that he handled the whole pre-draft process extremely poorly it's not a shock he fell to the 5th. If his name was Shedeur Johnson instead of Shedeur Sanders there wouldn't have been this massive hype train around him. The media hype misled a lot of people regarding his NFL projection. He basically projects as a backup and the last thing you want out of a backup is a circus. Their fault or not, that's why guys like The Golden Calf of Bristol, Kaepernick, and Cam never carved out careers as backups.
    • *disclaimer, no need to tell us what happened in the end, just quit watching after he gets the Mountain on the ground.  I mean, he technically beat him.  Renfrow isn't cocky enough to then get leg swept and then have all that other stuff happen to him.  
    • Well, it seems a little confusing, but I guess not: I guess they're thinking that we're going to the way that our receivers go. Barnwell just ranked us 31 at the (so-called) offensive skill positions. ESPN just doesn't think that much of the Panthers. I wonder if it was the O-line that bumped us up one spot, because they obviously don't think that much of our safety position, or our pass-rush. In any event, there should be ample enough bulletin board material here for the team. 
×
×
  • Create New...