Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why do people keep mentioning JR when it comes to drafting or signing players?


PantherFanForLife

Recommended Posts

JR will NOT be deciding our roster. LOL! It's ridiculous to think that. People need to stop.

And I haven't heard anyone from the club, or media, or inside source make the statement that JR is rebuilding the franchise in HIS philosophy all by himself. All that means is JR will find a coach with a different philosophy similar to what he wants but let him and the GM do their damn jobs.

Jerry Jones is the only owner I know that gets that involved in roster building.

Apparently everyone is confused by what you mean roster building.

Because every owner in the NFL builds their roster. They choose who to pay and who not to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you're telling me that Hurney just signs players and then he let's JR know after the fact?

Besides, money is what drives the league. So yeah, I'd say JR has his fair share of say in the matter.

I think what he's talking about the football side of things not the buisness side. He's commenting on how people are suddenly talking about JR like he's a GM even though he never has been. Even then I doubt JR does anymore than sign the check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what he's talking about the football side of things not the buisness side. He's commenting on how people are suddenly talking about JR like he's a GM even though he never has been. Even then I doubt JR does anymore than sign the check.

I get what you're saying, but doesn't signing the check build the roster?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what he's talking about the football side of things not the buisness side. He's commenting on how people are suddenly talking about JR like he's a GM even though he never has been. Even then I doubt JR does anymore than sign the check.

Exactly. People saying things like "I don't think JR will draft Fairley because....".

Just a meaningless statement. Of course JR won't draft Fairley or anyone else. He knows jack poo when it comes to finding the guys with the right abilities for the right positions that our team needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty safe to say that people mention JR when it comes to signing and drafting players right now because he's taken an active interest in the football side of things lately. JR is ultimately the boss and if he sets a strategy / goal / direction for the team it will be followed.

I don't personally think he'll be miromanaging the draft but it would be folly not to think his input is steering the direction of this team right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty safe to say that people mention JR when it comes to signing and drafting players right now because he's taken an active interest in the football side of things lately. JR is ultimately the boss and if he sets a strategy / goal / direction for the team it will be followed.

I don't personally think he'll be miromanaging the draft but it would be folly not to think his input is steering the direction of this team right now.

You really think the owner of our team has detailed stats and sheets on the strengths, weaknesses of our players, our defensive, offensive, special teams schemes, the playbook and what type of players the coach would need to make things work, not to mention scouting reports on draft prospects with strengths, weakness, on each player, etc...in order for him to actually make an educated decision?

Just think about it for a second. I am willing to bet there are players right now on our team or practice squad that JR doesn't even know their names.

PS: JR doesn't actually sign checks at the end of the month like everybody thinks either. LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS: JR doesn't actually sign checks at the end of the month like everybody thinks either. LOL.

LOL

We know.

It's called a contract.

They fulfill their end, he fulfills his.

Dude, do you not understand how a business works?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really think the owner of our team has detailed stats and sheets on the strengths, weaknesses of our players, our defensive, offensive, special teams schemes, the playbook and what type of players the coach would need to make things work, not to mention scouting reports on draft prospects with strengths, weakness, on each player, etc...in order for him to actually make an educated decision?

Just think about it for a second.

I'd like you to point out the part of my post where I said those things.

What I said is that he's mentioned because he's going to have input. In fact I pretty plainly said I didn't think he would micromanage the draft. But you are foolish if you think he doesn't have some input on the decision and even moreso if you don't think his input is shaping the overall direction of the team at the moment.

The nutshell Cliff's Notes version? He's mentioned because he'll have some input...and having input PLUS being the owner makes you relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JR will NOT be deciding our roster. LOL! It's ridiculous to think that. People need to stop.

And I haven't heard anyone from the club, or media, or inside source make the statement that JR is rebuilding the franchise in HIS philosophy all by himself. All that means is JR will find a coach with a different philosophy similar to what he wants but let him and the GM do their damn jobs.

Jerry Jones is the only owner I know that gets that involved in roster building.

I understand what you are saying. What I believe is that JR doesn't exactly pick players/coaches but suggest to our GM/coach on what he wants our team to do. For example he wants our team to be young so he tell Hurney that we need a youth movement and Hurney cuts vets. I Don't think he has decided who we draft but I think he will this year considering we will have a new coach and JR has said he wants our offense to change from being conservative, so Hurney should know to get a new OC and players to fit his scheme.

I think JR might not choose our 1st pick but he will tell our GM which direction he wants us to improve for example he tells Hurney he wants us to improve our offense so Hurney makes sure we draft AJ Green.

Am I making Sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS: JR doesn't actually sign checks at the end of the month like everybody thinks either. LOL.

It's a figure of speech - FFS. The owner of any decent sized company very rarely actually signs a check...but the phrase is still used. If you weren't looking for semantics to argue you'd probably use the phrase yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...