Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we draft AJ Green and keep Steve Smith, what will be the starting lineup at WR?


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

Not as cut and dried as it may appear. Smitty is arguably still a number one caliber receiver, but he's declared multiple times that he wants to play in the slot around other guys better than him.

Enter Brandon Lafell and David Gettis - two young guys who've shown a ton of potential... and then after april, if we draft Green, we've got perhaps the highest potential of all. Who, then, gets the start? Does it get decided in camp? Is it already a foregone conclusion? Will there simply be a constant rotation based on the offensive situation and the play called?

Any way it shakes out it'd be a great problem to have. Wide receiver could finally be one of the team's biggest strengths for the first time since the 2003 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a former God who is becoming mortal with smitty.

The 4th and 5th most productive rookies in 2010 who look like they could take strides as major contributors. Hell if Dwayne Jarrett had a season like that his bandwagon would turn into a massive sex orgy caravan.

Then we have what I remember some draft mag had rated as the #1 boom or bust prospect in the country. He's at #33 in this years draft. When he's been on the field he has looked like a fish out of whatever but his talent is undeniable. He needs a thicker lower frame and probably another 2 years before he could really be an essential cog in the machine. But boom or bust he needs to see the field.

So that's 4 guys already that while it's not anything special compared to the rest of the league, it's not nearly as dire as defensive tackle, quarterback or tight end.

Getting a tight end would make the offense far more dynamic than having 4 WR sets on a team that is built to run. Suddenly a 21 personnel group just says "we're probably going to run" rather than "wait for us to put the flanker in motion for the 8th time in the same drive and tackle Stewart for a loss".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a former God who is becoming mortal with smitty.

The 4th and 5th most productive rookies in 2010 who look like they could take strides as major contributors. Hell if Dwayne Jarrett had a season like that his bandwagon would turn into a massive sex orgy caravan.

Then we have what I remember some draft mag had rated as the #1 boom or bust prospect in the country. He's at #33 in this years draft. When he's been on the field he has looked like a fish out of whatever but his talent is undeniable. He needs a thicker lower frame and probably another 2 years before he could really be an essential cog in the machine. But boom or bust he needs to see the field.

So that's 4 guys already that while it's not anything special compared to the rest of the league, it's not nearly as dire as defensive tackle, quarterback or tight end.

Getting a tight end would make the offense far more dynamic than having 4 WR sets on a team that is built to run. Suddenly a 21 personnel group just says "we're probably going to run" rather than "wait for us to put the flanker in motion for the 8th time in the same drive and tackle Stewart for a loss".

I don't think that matters anymore. Doesn't matter what this team was built to do. We're starting pretty much from scratch and also, judging by last year you could have fooled me we were built to run.

Green is my top pick, and would lot to have a guy of his size and athletic ability at WR. We have been looking for someone like him for years to fill a #2 spot, and now that Smith's career is on the downside, we need someone like Green even more.

I am 100% on the Green bandwagon, but something tells me it won't happen:frown5:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that matters anymore. Doesn't matter what this team was built to do. We're starting pretty much from scratch and also, judging by last year you could have fooled me we were built to run.

Green is my top pick, and would lot to have a guy of his size and athletic ability at WR. We have been looking for someone like him for years to fill a #2 spot, and now that Smith's career is on the downside, we need someone like Green even more.

I am 100% on the Green bandwagon, but something tells me it won't happen:frown5:

yea seems like everybody's on the Fairley bandwagon

i think there will be talented DT in FA but owell i'll be happy either way

(but more happy with AJ Green)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, that's pretty much how I'd feel. I'd much rather have Green but I won't have negative feelings if we take Fairley. I would probably have some negative feelings if we take Gabbert at #1 (or any QB...).

In regards to the topic of the thread, I think in 2 WR sets it'll be Smitty and Green; 3 WR sets it'll be Green, Gettis, Smitty in the slot.

yea seems like everybody's on the Fairley bandwagon

i think there will be talented DT in FA but owell i'll be happy either way

(but more happy with AJ Green)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that matters anymore. Doesn't matter what this team was built to do. We're starting pretty much from scratch and also, judging by last year you could have fooled me we were built to run.

Green is my top pick, and would lot to have a guy of his size and athletic ability at WR. We have been looking for someone like him for years to fill a #2 spot, and now that Smith's career is on the downside, we need someone like Green even more.

I am 100% on the Green bandwagon, but something tells me it won't happen:frown5:

the guy who is doing the building seems content with fitting the system to the players at least on defense. I don't think his philosophy would be much different for offense.

He also seemed very set on finding a capable tight end.

we've been looking for years to find someone to fill a #2 spot. And we have 2 guys that looked like they could possibly do that next year. Very encouraging play. I'm not holding my breath after Colbert having the worst sophmore slump ever.

The WR corp isn't tops in the league but DT and QB should really be ranked about 38th out of 32 teams because of how shitty they are.

We have guys 5 deep that we KNOW cannot being a starting defensive tackle in this league. All of our Tight Ends are blockers. QB is a disaster area. CB will have a sizable whole as I doubt Marshall stays.

It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to draft Green based on need. DT and QB are the worst in the league. Those positions shoulder the majority of the blame for why the team sucked this bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bleacher Report trade and mock has us trading to 9 and picking SG Brayden Burries Charlotte Hornets recieve: Kyrie Irving and No. 9 pick Dallas Mavericks receive: LaMelo Ball, No. 14 pick and No. 18 pick The Hornets just finished their sixth season with Ball. It was only their second with a winning record, their sixth without a playoff trip and the sixth in which someone else paced them in win shares (Kon Knueppel this time around). While they'd surely like to keep building on their second-half momentum, maybe they're just unconvinced that Ball can lead a winning team. Maybe they credit that stretch run less to him and more to the addition of Knueppel, the ascension of Brandon Miller and some out-of-nowhere gains on the defensive end.   Charlotte should be dreaming big right now, and perhaps it believes a steadier hand at point guard is needed to realize that. Or maybe it feels it needs a little more time to bring everything together and thinks that task would be simpler without Ball's money on the books and with a top-10 pick in a loaded draft instead of two selections in the mid-teens.   Either way, this shakeup works. Short-term, a healthy Irving should be far easier to follow than Ball. You may not always know if Irving is playing, but you know what you'll get if he does: elite shotmaking, all-time handles, offensive ingenuity and the ability to work both on and off the ball. He could show this young roster what's required to win for a year or two (he has a $42.4 million player option for 2027-28) or even stick around longer if the partnership proves especially fruitful.   The Hornets also add a building block in Burries, who offers both plug-and-play polish and flashes of shot-creation that hint at star potential. In short, they could better their chances of winning both now and in the future while collecting both the best player in the trade and the highest draft pic
    • I'd hire him in a heartbeat. Hell if he wanted the job, I'd have Canales packing his poo right now and I don't dislike Canales. It's just that firing a 106-58 coach is crazy work. That's a 65% winning percentage. That's the equivalent of averaging 11 wins a season. That's incomprehensible for a fanbase That's never experienced back to back winning seaons.
×
×
  • Create New...