Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Allen Bailey from The U


ZedLeppelin

Recommended Posts

Will be the best player from this draft. Hes the best physical prospect from this draft with elite upside, more then Bowers, Fairley, Green anyone.

As a Miami fan I can say the coaching staff was a complete abomination and it is a joke he wasn't an All-American. Since the new Coach came in players have been talking non stop about how hard the first few workouts have been compared to what they endured under their old coach Randy Shammin which was a complete joke of a system from the workouts, to the filmroom, to the gameplan.

57bailey10glb2.jpg

90899199_display_image.jpg?1290030351

blulk.jpg

dcg0i8.jpg

Miami players have a history of being studs in the NFL, Beason was under developed but has come in and been our best player. Sam Sheilds from the U went undrafted and got two interceptions and a forced fumple in the NFCCG today and its only his rookie season. I'm telling you Bailey has been extremely under developed at the U but with the staff we have in place he will develop into the best player from the draft and it won't take him long to be dominant. He also has no character concerns.

All the complaining about there being no true dominant number 1 players in this draft, Allen Bailey will be that guy and we will regret passing on him for a Fairley or Green. He will destroy the combine and at 6'4 290 with freakish speed for his size, he is a Justin Tuck type of player with the potential to be even more dominant as hes heavier then Tuck.

Hardy - Bailey - Fat Guy - CJ

While being coached by Rivera, McDermott and co. will have QBs TREMBLING!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like allen and think he could possibly be a steal for somebody, as he has a alot of upside, but im not sure how he would fit in scheme wise for us. He's more of an 3-4 end than anything. I would be willing to try him at DT, but we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's considered a late 1st early 2nd. He's kind of a tweener, good speed for a DT but lacks anchor, and good size as a DE but can he get to the QB against elite LTs? Solid potential, but its a stretch (and smells of homerism) to say he is guaranteed to be the best player in the draft.

So, what do you do to people around here who make guarantees that don't pan out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Using college stats to prove someone is a better pro!?!??! Cmon! We all want Tmac to succeed, but at this point his Pro stats are 0.0.0
    • Clark played 2 seasons in college and had a grand total of 1,340 yards with 6 TDs. T-Mac had 1,402 and 10 as a Sophomore and 1,319 and 8 as a Junior in one less game since they didn't make a bowl (not to mention his 702 and 8 as a Freshman). In 9 years, Chark had 4,440 yards in his 7 seasons in the NFL and 2 years of college playing time, T-Mac had 3,423 yards in his 3 seasons in college alone. Chark's only 1,000 yard NFL season (which was only 1,008 yards to begin with, and only 3 games over 79 yards that year) came in an offense where the only other non RB's in the offense to have more than 35 targets were Chris Conely (90 targets for 775 yards) and Dede Westbrook (101 targets for 660 yards).  His 2nd best season, his competition for targets was Keelan Cole Sr (88 targets for 642 yards), Laviska (79 targets for 600) and Conley again (63 targets for 471). Beyond his 1k season, he had seasons of 706, 525, 502, 174, 154, and 31 yards, despite being the #1 WR on his team for 3 of his 4 seasons that he had over 174 yards. Any 1st round WR should already be considered a better WR than that, let alone one taken in the Top 10 and has the college statistics that T-Mac had.  Had we traded back and taken Egbuka or Golden, I'd still be saying the same thing about them vs Chark, this has nothing to do with my personal love of T-Mac. 
    • I'm not sure his idea of us being 28th at the start of the season isn't wrong. It's hard to project who we are based off the fact all the rookies we are depending on to contribute but know nothing about. we don't know what derrick brown looks like week 1.. hunter renfrow t-mac,legette, and our tight ends. we are going to have two new starting safeties no matter what. I think it's hard to know just which way the dial can swing on this roster.
×
×
  • Create New...