Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The New Charlie's Angles TV Reboot!!


Jangler

Recommended Posts

http://www.masslive.com/entertainment/index.ssf/2011/01/meet_the_new_charlies_angels.html

9229277-large.jpg

A pilot starring Minka Kelly (“Friday Night Light”) Rachael Taylor (“Transformers”) and Annie Ilonzeh ("General Hospital") is under consideration at ABC.

Deadline.com is reporting that Ilonzeh has already been signed and Kelly and Taylor are close to inking deals to portray the trio of sexy detectives. Robert Wagner would supply the voice of their never-seen boss, Charlie.

The pilot would be a reboot of the 1976-1981 TV series, which originally starred Farrah Fawcett, Jaclyn Smith and Kate Jackson. The original voice of Charlie was that of John Forsythe.

The pilot is being produced by Sony Pictures TV and Drew Barrymore's Flower Films.

Barrymore starred with Cameron Diaz and Lucy Liu is a 2000 big screen remake.

Unlike the original ABC series, the new version is reportedly set in Miami instead of Los Angeles. Production is expected to begin as early as next month.

Oh man!! Could T'n'A TV be making a come back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God Dammit. One original idea, Hollywood, ONE! I dare you, I double dare you, I triple dog dare you to come up with one original idea.

I mean for fug sake, how many 70's and 80's era shows have been rebooted now? Compounded with the "Sassy single female lawyer" shows, four billion CSI and Law and Order spinoffs, and 20 billion reality shows. God, if I didn't have AMC (or Fox when House is on), I'd never watch TV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...