Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our Panthers 2011


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

BOLD ARE KEEPER ITALICS ARE POSSIBLE PLAIN GONE

IMO these are the folks that will have a job in 2011 for the Panthers providing there is a season and all of our Core Free Agents are signed.

I think because of the new staff very few beyond the starting line up will be locked in on this team.

Of the italics I think are gone is Robinson (bust) Brayton (no longer needed) Rosario or King but not both(if we dont bring in a FA). I believe Barnidge is more of the TE we are looking for providing he can improve his blocking. I also believe that if we use a 2 TE set, King is more of what we want than Rosario. If we bring in a Free Agent I wouldn't be surprised to see Rosario and King let go.

Charly Martin was having a good preseason and looked like he might make the team when he got injured. I think he has a better chance of staying just because he reminds me of Proehl (I said in preseason)

Moore or a Free Agent will be here. Pike I think should be given a little bit more opportunity to show what he can do. If he hasn't improved his arm strength then let him go.

I think the RB corp is by far the most set position. Dwill, Stewart, Goodson and Fiammeta make this a good unit add Sutton and it is set.

I like our defensive ends and I think Brayton will be cut loose. Keeping with the new tradition of letting the young blood play. I see some exciting times with Brown, Johnson, Hardy and Norwood with this new defensive scheme. Though Norwood is probably a tweener. Taylor is history.

I like Landri, Nesbitt and Hayden but I believe Johnson is our only set guy on the D-Line. IMO is why we will draft Fairley. We just really don't have much there. Only because of his motor do I think we keep Landri. Landri next to a beast like Fairley could really do well.

Linebacker is like our RB corp. I really think if we keep Davis we will be pretty set with our LBs.

DBs I like and hopefully Marshall will wise up and know he has a starting position on a team that is going to be good next year.

Pugh, Stanford and McClain from last years draft might really be steals. They will definitely provide depth.

I know many people have slammed Hurney for the picks he has made and some of the trades he has made have really bitten us in the A$$ but he has made up for it with some late round luck. Gettis, Stanford, Pugh and McClain all might end up being good steals for us.

I do hope we fill our needs with some midrange players like we used to. Many of them have panned out. Much better than the High Priced ones we had.

Though not the expert that many of you (hahahaha) This is how I see it playing out. I await your comments.

Offensive Line

R. Kalil

T. Wharton

G. Schwartz

M. Bernadeau

Robinson

CJ Davis

J. Gross

J. Otah

R. Petite

G. Williams

TE & WR

Barnidge

Rosario

King

Smitty

LaFell

Gettis

Edwards

Martin

Wright

Clowney

Backfield

Clausen

Moore

Pike

St. Pierre

Null

Williams

Stewart

Sutton

Goodson

Fiammeta

Jackson

Defensive Line

Brayton

Brown

Johnson

Hardy

Norwood

Taylor

Landri

Irvin

Johnson

Nesbitt

Hayden

Linebackers

Beason

Davis

Jamar Williams

Anderson

Connor

T. William

Hodge

Jason Williams

Senn

Harris

DB

Gamble

Marshall

Munnerlyn

McCain

Stanford

Wilson

Martin

Pugh

Jordan

Godfrey

Hudson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we let Richard Marshall roll out of town. I'd be very suprised if both Matt Moore and Pike are still on the team next year. Armanti Edwards should be in bold, not because he is good, but because there is no way we wasted a 2011 2nd round draft pick on a guy we are going to cut after one season, and if we go hard for an all purpose TE in free agency or the draft (as expected) then one would assume we would keep Jeff King being the best blocker of the current bunch. I'm not sure what kind of contract Tyrelle Sutton has with us, but unless he is a free agent, i do not think we will lose him.

Other than that, the list is pretty solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we let Richard Marshall roll out of town. I'd be very suprised if both Matt Moore and Pike are still on the team next year. Armanti Edwards should be in bold, not because he is good, but because there is no way we wasted a 2011 2nd round draft pick on a guy we are going to cut after one season, and if we go hard for an all purpose TE in free agency or the draft (as expected) then one would assume we would keep Jeff King being the best blocker of the current bunch. I'm not sure what kind of contract Tyrelle Sutton has with us, but unless he is a free agent, i do not think we will lose him.

Other than that, the list is pretty solid.

I could see Moore and Pike staying.

Pike on Practice Squad.

Moore, Clausen, Vet FA on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we let Richard Marshall roll out of town. I'd be very suprised if both Matt Moore and Pike are still on the team next year. Armanti Edwards should be in bold, not because he is good, but because there is no way we wasted a 2011 2nd round draft pick on a guy we are going to cut after one season, and if we go hard for an all purpose TE in free agency or the draft (as expected) then one would assume we would keep Jeff King being the best blocker of the current bunch. I'm not sure what kind of contract Tyrelle Sutton has with us, but unless he is a free agent, i do not think we will lose him.

Other than that, the list is pretty solid.

I had him bolded and then put him italics because you just don't know whether the New OC is gonna want that type of project. His scheme maybe not include an AE type of player. So I italics him. I agree with your point though.

It will be Moore or a Free Agent. I think Pike gets an opportunity and if he doesn't pan out. They jettison him.

I would like to keep Marshall and hopefully he is excited about this type of defense. IMO this type of pressure Defense puts DB's in good positions for interceptions.

But all your points are very valid and can't argue too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody please give me some clarification on something I'm confused about:

Using D_Will as an example. His contract is up. He is not a RFA to the best of my knowledge. We can offer him a contract, but the ball is in his court. He can accept it or choose to move on to another team if he so chooses. Barring a tag of course.

Is this correct? Can he walk regardless of the offer we make? How many other players does this apply to? I believe Rosario and King should be in the same situation. Moore as well.

I've been lurking around, and haven't' heard anybody address this directly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see Moore and Pike staying.

Pike on Practice Squad.

Moore, Clausen, Vet FA on the roster.

I think Pike will come into camp, but if we demote him to practice squad another team would take a chance and sign him to active roster. Regardless, Pike won't be dressing out for the Panthers next season if we "address" the QB situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had him bolded and then put him italics because you just don't know whether the New OC is gonna want that type of project. His scheme maybe not include an AE type of player. So I italics him. I agree with your point though.

I don't think Chudzinski has the power to have Armanti Edwards cut from the team before next season. AE is Hurney's 2010 draft project, not Chud's. Hurney and Rivera hired Chud, Graves, and Proehl to develop our young guys like Armanti, not give up on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Chudzinski has the power to have Armanti Edwards cut from the team before next season. AE is Hurney's 2010 draft project, not Chud's. Hurney and Rivera hired Chud, Graves, and Proehl to develop our young guys like Armanti, not give up on them.

OK.... the italics means he isn't a LOCK.. IMO he isn't. I believe he is more than likely going to be a Panther next season but if Chud has no use for him than maybe we trade him away for a low round pick.

Once again... I think he stays... I hope he stays but he isn't a LOCK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again... I think he stays... I hope he stays but he isn't a LOCK.

We are going to have to agree to disagree on this one. I would think Armanti is more of a LOCK than FA's: DWill, RMarshall, RKalil, & CJohnson only for the simple fact that they are FA's and will have an opportunity to field offers from other teams. As much as it pains me to say it, I would even consider Armanti more of a LOCK to be on next year's roster than Steve Smith only because there are rumblings Smitty is unhappy and we can trade and get value for him.

Maybe i am being a little picky, but i just thought AE should be in bold moreso than some of the other guys you listed as LOCKS because he is under contract and has been labeled a 2-3 year project since we drafted him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...