Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

free agent QB's


Leeroy Jenkins PhD

Recommended Posts

Peyton Manning (IND)

Michael Vick (PHI)

Brett Favre (MIN)

Seneca Wallace (CLE)

Matt Hasselbeck (SEA)

Matt Moore (CAR)

Alex Smith (SF)

Matt Leinart (HOU)

Marc Bulger (BAL)

Todd Collins (CHI)

Caleb Hanie (CHI)

Brady Quinn (DEN)

Drew Stanton (DET)

Trent Edwards (JAC)

Luke McCown (JAC)

Brodie Croyle (KC)

Chad Pennington (MIA)

Tyler Thigpen (MIA)

Tarvaris Jackson (MIN)

Jim Sorgi (NYG)

Kellen Clemens (NYJ)

Kyle Boller (OAK)

Bruce Gradkowski (OAK)

Dennis Dixon (PIT)

Billy Volek (SD)

Troy Smith (SF)

Kerry Collins (TEN)

Rex Grossman (WAS)

So taking into account that there is no possibility of Vick or Manning or Favre, who do you think we bring in? You know were going to bring in a vet at QB. There is no doubt in my mind. Or do you think we make a trade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my short list...

gradkowski

tarvaris jackson

grossman

thigpen

moore

alex smith

derek anderson

[edit: caleb hanie...i keep forgetting about this guy.]

i'm not loving that list, but i don't want anyone over 30. got to be thinking long term with these guys. someone over 30 won't be here long term. the guy needs to fit the young team and be in keeping with the growing young team philosophy richardson has. remember he wanted to give the young guys a chance to get experience on the field and was taking a long view with them. we have to find out who the franchise QB is going to be going forward and the only real way to know is to take risks with younger guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my short list...

gradkowski

tarvaris jackson

grossman

thigpen

moore

alex smith

derek anderson

i'm not loving that list, but i don't want anyone over 30. got to be thinking long term with these guys. someone over 30 won't be here long term. the guy needs to fit the young team and be in keeping with the growing young team philosophy richardson has. remember he wanted to give the young guys a chance to get experience on the field and was taking a long view with them. we have to find out who the franchise QB is going to be going forward and the only real way to know is to take risks with younger guys.

Unless you are under the illusion that Clausen is our long term man and we need an older vet to start a couple years and be a mentor to Clausen. I for one am not ready to give up on him but at the same time am not willing to put all my eggs in that basket

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you are under the illusion that Clausen is our long term man and we need an older vet to start a couple years and be a mentor to Clausen. I for one am not ready to give up on him but at the same time am not willing to put all my eggs in that basket
i have hopes that he could be, but i'm not counting on it, neither should the team.

we don't need an old vet to start a couple years to mentor anyone. that concept is as archaic as foxball. having a mentor would be fine, as long as we didn't start him. the danger in having an older one is the temptation would be there to start him anyways instead of letting the young guy take his lumps and get experience that is much needed for development.

you get a young guy and get him in the game. that's the best way for them to learn and the offense to grow with him as a unit.

look around the league and you'll see that most teams that are having QB changes are getting younger guys in earlier and it is going well. rookies are getting the start and they are creating a system that gives them a chance for some success. running the ball a lot is a huge part of that. only teams that should be letting a young QB sit behind an old one are those teams that already have an old vet entrenched into the role with the offense built around him already, like what green bay had. we don't have that here.

we are a young team without an identity on offense, but who is going to be forging one. best way for that to be forged is with a young QB who could end up being the franchise QB. get him in the game and get the offense built around his strengths and weaknesses and get him and the other players in sync with each other.

again, this is in keeping with richardsons plan for the team going forward. he wanted fox to get the young guys on the field getting experience and fox wouldn't do it, so he dumped the old guys. i'm thinking that was one of the conditions that rivera was given. this is a young team on purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seneca wallace, Matt Hasselbeck, and Bruce Gradkowski have all been starter's and might not end up with contract's from the team's there on now. Guy's like Manning, Vick, forget em. Troy Smith, Dennis Dixon, and Caleb Hanie are yoynger guy's with some upside but we've got young QB's on the roster now. Would Like to See Matt Moore brought back in next season too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wallace and hass are WCO guys.

i do like the prospect of caleb hanie, though. i keep forgetting about him, but i like waht i saw of him. lots of room for growth and a good bit of potential there.

i need to be including him in my list of prospects for young vet QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...