Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schefter: CBA Meeting for Today Canceled, JR Rubbing People Wrong Way


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

So, if owners lock out, player contracts are void and they don't get paid correct?

Maybe its a dumb question:

Whats to keep the already organized NFLPA from organizing its talent under 32 puppet 'owners' that they identify and sign up for. The only thing trademarked is the franchise brands. NFLPA applies for loan to foot the bill to pay the players a marginal 255k min salary (they were going to make zero that year otherwise). And then, leasing college football stadiums across the country to play the games and letting the tv stations come to them?

Seems like it would be pretty easy really... Every step of the way they would have all the leverage. Banks would jump in line to give the loan to pay the players for a season after seeing the NFL's (formally the NFL at least) revenue books. Colleges would jump in line and give sweetheart deals knowing that if they don't negotiate with the new boss, there would be no way for them to get top talent into their schools anymore as the paydays would be gone. NFLPA could institute whatever share distribution they wanted and the puppet owners would gladly sign. All they'd have to do is change their team names/logos, but keep whatever hometown identity they are currently associated with the same to carry over the fans ... I.E. Carolina Cougars... etc etc.

Done. Thanks for negotiating NFL.

Eventually, 4 or 5 years from now, they could then buy their original stadiums for pennies on the dollar if they wanted to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if owners lock out, player contracts are void and they don't get paid correct?

Maybe its a dumb question:

Whats to keep the already organized NFLPA from organizing its talent under 32 puppet 'owners' that they identify and sign up for. The only thing trademarked is the franchise brands. NFLPA applies for loan to foot the bill to pay the players a marginal 255k min salary (they were going to make zero that year otherwise). And then, leasing college football stadiums across the country to play the games and letting the tv stations come to them?

This just means going to play for the UFL or startup league. I assume this could happen if the lockout dragged on for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would a player want to play for this old dolt? You guys better not hold your breath with us signing free agents ever again as long as Richardson's still in charge. Between him and Marty Hurney, he's turning Charlotte into the least desirable destination for free agents in the league. "The Carolina Panthers: We're crappy AND we won't pay you! Now won't you sign with us please?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if owners lock out, player contracts are void and they don't get paid correct?

Maybe its a dumb question:

Whats to keep the already organized NFLPA from organizing its talent under 32 puppet 'owners' that they identify and sign up for. The only thing trademarked is the franchise brands. NFLPA applies for loan to foot the bill to pay the players a marginal 255k min salary (they were going to make zero that year otherwise). And then, leasing college football stadiums across the country to play the games and letting the tv stations come to them?

Seems like it would be pretty easy really... Every step of the way they would have all the leverage. Banks would jump in line to give the loan to pay the players for a season after seeing the NFL's (formally the NFL at least) revenue books. Colleges would jump in line and give sweetheart deals knowing that if they don't negotiate with the new boss, there would be no way for them to get top talent into their schools anymore as the paydays would be gone. NFLPA could institute whatever share distribution they wanted and the puppet owners would gladly sign. All they'd have to do is change their team names/logos, but keep whatever hometown identity they are currently associated with the same to carry over the fans ... I.E. Carolina Cougars... etc etc.

Done. Thanks for negotiating NFL.

Eventually, 4 or 5 years from now, they could then buy their original stadiums for pennies on the dollar if they wanted to.

None of it seems easy really and history has proven that multiple times. First, I can't imagine an NFL player risking his lucrative NFL career to slum around for 250K a year just to prove they don't need the NFL. I doubt anyone would be jumping at the chance to fund another football league, especially one run by the clowns currently running the NFLPA. Colleges would never jump at the chance to screw over the NFL for a thrown together, hodgepodge league that would have little, if any, chance of long term success. Also, without major TV contracts, stadiums, or fan loyalty where exactly would this revenue stream originate? Sounds like the owners have all of the leverage here just like most people outside the NFLPA realize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There isn't one thing unreasonable that the owners are asking for, and if it takes an real man like JR to drive that into the thick skulls of the NFLPA then let be so.

SUCK IT, NFLPA. :dita:

Sometimes in life, you have to play the asshole because it's the right thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There isn't one thing unreasonable that the owners are asking for, and if it takes an real man like JR to drive that into the thick skulls of the NFLPA then let be so.

SUCK IT, NFLPA. :dita:

Sometimes in life, you have to play the asshole because it's the right thing to do.

That's the attitude that will give us no football for awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the attitude that will give us no football for awhile.

I love the sport dearly, but it would disappoint me MORE to see the players union stand in the way of improvements to the sport and the fan experience, than to see the owners concede to the entitlement and faked suffrage of the union.

Especially because this is the union that defends Albert Haynesworth's ill-gotten gains against the Redskins, JaMarcus Russel's rookie salary against Oakland, your inability to watch some away pre-season games, and annual wage increases of 10% per year forever. Like I said, the NFLPA can SUCK IT.

:smash:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...