Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera says we will draft # 1 pick based on biggest need and we will use the tag


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

No, TRD is just a Clausen homer.

That's the worst thing you've ever called me.

I'm simply a fan of the best QB on the team. Until that changes, I will continue to support him and the Panthers. I hope Clausen improves and they bring Moore back and they sign a FA and they all go to camp and the best player wins. That is what is best for this franchise.

Drafting another QB is not the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB is biggest need. DT is 2nd biggest need. 3rd would be CB if marshall leaves. WR would be 4th if there are questions about smith staying around.

RG and TE are pretty big needs as well, but there isn't anyone i would consider for either of those in the first 10-15 picks.

It's interesting though, because my impression is that Hurney has always been a BPA guy... maybe that philosophy changes when you're holding the 1st pick and you know who will be available?
he has been a BPA, but BPA that is a position of need until after the first or second round then it's straight BPA for the most part. at least that's the way i always looked at it.
Cam Newton's potential > an aging Carson Palmer and his high ass salary

No thanks to the Bungles QB.

preach it. palmer peaked 4 or 5 years ago, has a bum arm and a huge contract with no future to speak of.

do.not.want.

Well, let me check myself on that based on the 2010 draft (assuming no rookie scale):

1. St.Louis Sam Bradford - QB 6 year $86 million contract, $50 million guaranteed

VS.

3. Tampa Bay Gerald McCoy - DT 5 year $63 million contract, $35 million guaranteed

35.Tampa Bay Brian Price - DT - 4 year $5.35 million contract, $2.72 million signing bonus

Total = 68.35 million with 37.72 million guaranteed/signing bonus.

Nope, based on drafting a QB # 1 overall last year vs. two DT's at picks 3 and 35, # 1 overall pick would still me much more expensive, especially in terms of guaranteed money, stupid statement on my part...

...but if there is a rookie scale this equation could change.

there will be a rookie wage scale in place and it will take effect this year.
If we draft Newton I don't expect Clausen to be here next year.

I expect us to draft either DT or WR though

QB is a huge position of need. moore isn't even on the team at this point. if we draft newton, it will be both moore and pike who are gone. they would probably bring in an older vet so there is someone with experienced eyes on the sidelines and the starter will either be clausen (hoping that he doesn't suck and can get some trade value) or newton (b/c clausen just sucks).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB is a huge position of need. moore isn't even on the team at this point. if we draft newton, it will be both moore and pike who are gone. they would probably bring in an older vet so there is someone with experienced eyes on the sidelines and the starter will either be clausen (hoping that he doesn't suck and can get some trade value) or newton (b/c clausen just sucks).

Do you think Rivera will start his tenure as the Panthers head coach with:

1: A rookie who is considered a major project at this point and probably 2 years away from meaningful contributions

2: A sophomore who was the worst starter in football last year and didn't show much if any growth throughout the season.

3: An older vet who is there only to mentor but likely cannot perform if he were called upon

If that happens, how many games do you think we win and how long before you think fans are calling for Rivera's head?

If we draft a QB, which I don't think we do, I think they wipe their hands of Clausen and go with Rookie, Moore/Vet who can play and is still young, and older vet

From recent comments it seems like Moore is still an option to them and it makes sense for them to bring him back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wasnt moore injured 3 years ago?

anyway, I don't think we cut Clausen even if we go QB. I think we go to camp with Rookie/Clausen/2 FAs... and then you go in with the rookie and the 2 best out of the other 3, with Clausen likely getting a slight nod if it's close cause I don't think Hurney is over his mancrush yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone ask Rivera in the interview if QB was still the #1 need? Maybe Clausen managed to somehow convince them of his awesomeness... either that or they like Moore more than any of the rookies in this draft.

Man, I can't imagine what this board would do if we passed on drafting a QB and Moore started next year, haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone ask Rivera in the interview if QB was still the #1 need? Maybe Clausen managed to somehow convince them of his awesomeness... either that or they like Moore more than any of the rookies in this draft.

Man, I can't imagine what this board would do if we passed on drafting a QB and Moore started next year, haha

:willy_nilly:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think Rivera will start his tenure as the Panthers head coach with:

1: A rookie who is considered a major project at this point and probably 2 years away from meaningful contributions

2: A sophomore who was the worst starter in football last year and didn't show much if any growth throughout the season.

3: An older vet who is there only to mentor but likely cannot perform if he were called upon

If that happens, how many games do you think we win and how long before you think fans are calling for Rivera's head?

If we draft a QB, which I don't think we do, I think they wipe their hands of Clausen and go with Rookie, Moore/Vet who can play and is still young, and older vet

From recent comments it seems like Moore is still an option to them and it makes sense for them to bring him back.

their confidence in newton and clausen being able to do well will depend on rivera's confidence in his coaching staff.

they won't be dropping clausen. they may trade him away, but what are they going to get for him? best chance they have is for him to show he can improve. they still have a couple million guaranteed invested in clausen. they don't have anything invested in moore and moore isn't better than many vet FA options out there. i just see no upside to moore staying around over some other vet and don't see why we would outright cut clausen.

a younger vet who could compete for the short term job might be a better option, but newton would benefit more from someone who has a good bit of game experience on the sidelines.

if they draft newton, they will probably try to get him in the game as early as possible, though they won't have much in the way of expectations right away. the game plan will be safe and easy for him, much like it is for any rookie QB that is asked to start who play for well coached teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone ask Rivera in the interview if QB was still the #1 need? Maybe Clausen managed to somehow convince them of his awesomeness... either that or they like Moore more than any of the rookies in this draft.

Man, I can't imagine what this board would do if we passed on drafting a QB and Moore started next year, haha

i can't see either clausen or moore impressing enough to warrant passing on the top QB prospect.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

their confidence in newton and clausen being able to do well will depend on rivera's confidence in his coaching staff.

they won't be dropping clausen. they may trade him away, but what are they going to get for him? best chance they have is for him to show he can improve. they still have a couple million guaranteed invested in clausen. they don't have anything invested in moore and moore isn't better than many vet FA options out there. i just see no upside to moore staying around over some other vet and don't see why we would outright cut clausen.

a younger vet who could compete for the short term job might be a better option, but newton would benefit more from someone who has a good bit of game experience on the sidelines.

if they draft newton, they will probably try to get him in the game as early as possible, though they won't have much in the way of expectations right away. the game plan will be safe and easy for him, much like it is for any rookie QB that is asked to start who play for well coached teams.

Exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they still have a couple million guaranteed invested in clausen. they don't have anything invested in moore and moore isn't better than many vet FA options out there. i just see no upside to moore staying around over some other vet and don't see why we would outright cut clausen.

They have less than 2 mil invested in Clausen for the remainder of his contract.

You think that is going to play a role in deciding whether or not to keep him? 2 mil? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't see how Rivera goes into the season, his first as a head coach, with a guy who has a lot of question marks about playing at this level, a guy who can't play at this level, and an old guy that was never good enough to play at this level.

Does that sound like a good way to start off the Rivera era era era? I just don't see them doing that. If you do then I guess that's where we differ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
    • He is a talented player with a lot of potential but ultimately he is a legend in his own mind and the minds of those who attack on his behalf when people pinpoint inconvenient truths. I could see people being so hostile over him if he actually had that kind of juice but he doesn't. Even in the Heat win LaMelo took 31 shots and was 40%. If not for Coby White's late heroics we would have lost in regulation. The reality is we do have pieces in place to compete in the playoffs but in year 6 and with a supermax and a salary that is only going to increase over the next few years LaMelo Ball simply does not look like a franchise centerpiece that you can go on multiple playoff runs with. Look at someone like Trae Young. His team moved on. And he actually took them to the conference finals. The Hornets are at a crossroads. Very tough conversations need to be had in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...