Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will we trade tonight?


Trade or Not   

73 members have voted

  1. 1. Will we trade and when

    • TRADE UP
      0
    • STAY AT 8
      25
    • TRADE DOWN
      48


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, chknwing said:

If Jeanty is still there at #8, I think we trade with dallas picking up #44.  Dallas is desperate for a RB.  NO could trade up 1 spot to keep other teams from trading with carolina to pick Sanders.  Denver and Pitt are options but I dont think we want to trade that far down

I agree with everything but NO wants Dart.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I agree with everything but NO wants Dart.

I agree. I think they take Dart at 9. If we get a trade back offer it's because of Jeanty, Dart and I could even see an OL or DL as possibilities too. I don't think this draft will be as vanilla as people think once it get's started. People can talk about value and weak top of the class but this is the 2025 draft and it's the only one you get. Someone will take what they can because that's all you can do. Maybe that guy would be 10-15 slots lower last year but it ain't last year. I think Sanders isn't qb 2. He's pushed because of his father. He's a 2nd rnd qb at  best even in this draft. I wouldn't be surprised if he's the 3rd or even 4th qb taken. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Panthers Rhule said:

which is why now is the time to draft him so we're set for next season when I'm sure Moten will be gone. His career doesn't have to be over it just won't be here. Sometimes drafting ahead is the best move. Is there a player you think we can draft at 8 that will start day 1? If so, who?

It’s not about starting, if we take an OT in the 1st, the only path to any playing time at all is injuries.

thats not how you should use a 1st on a team with so many holes.  If an OT falls in the 2nd it would be more acceptable, but even then we can get players there who will play for us and make an impact this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

It’s not about starting, if we take an OT in the 1st, the only path to any playing time at all is injuries.

thats not how you should use a 1st on a team with so many holes.  If an OT falls in the 2nd it would be more acceptable, but even then we can get players there who will play for us and make an impact this season.

Well, if you look at their list of who they might select at 8 there are 8 players. Two are tackles, four are OLBs, then 1 DT, WR and S. That says to me that they think Tackle needs to be addressed. Then the question is which is easier to get in round 2, your tackle or OLB?

In round 2 they have 3 olbs and 2 ilbs listed as well.

So that's 9 lbs consider for our first 2 picks. They have their next tackle listed for the 3rd rnd and only 1

 

 

 

Edited by Panthers Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • While I really hope things pan out for the young man, sometimes you've got to make a calculated guess on your returns. I wanted so bad to see us use our first round pick on a LB, C or TE this season, but I think this one injury changes everything. I might suggest taking the best and the second best OTs available in the draft with our first and second round picks. The injury to Icky really makes the first one a good choice and an affordable one. And Moton, who is long in the tooth, needs someone in the wings behind him.  This also means that BC is going to need to get a contract for this upcoming season both as a starter at LT and to train the younger player behind him. Also it means that we need to extend a solid contract to Cade Mays and lock him down as our Center for the next four years. Maybe Icky can recover fully and be a starting LT again, but the odds aren't in his favor. Maybe he could be back in line to play as a guard right as our current starters' contracts wind down. It's not pretty having to spend all your picks and money on the line, but it seems to be the wise investment in light of everything.
    • Unfortunate situation.  if one of the top LTs fall in the draft I think it’s a no brainer draft pick. Then if icky returns he can move to guard and replace one of our highly paid guards that are here now.   
    • I dont really expect anyone to have any character or values when the system doesn't. I would respect those who did though. College Football is losing what little interest I had in it. I wasn't against giving the athletes some control but whatever this system is will kill it over time.
×
×
  • Create New...