Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Potential changes to playoff seeding

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

 

in 2014 we won the division with a losing record.  Haven't checked but with the new rule we could have been left out

Yeah I was in ATL for that final game to win the division.  That was my question if winning the division gets you in and then they seed based off of record or if record will determine everything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted

Don't see how it matters other than taking care of the precious at the top. If you're a better team, then you'll win at home or away. Really not that big a deal unless you're traveling across country. Then again, most playoff games are later in the day, so that doesn't matter either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gapanthersfan Mentor

Gapanthersfan

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, HaricotVert said:

Feels a bit like a change that’s not based as much in fairness and good of the game and more to pacify owners in strong divisions. 

This. 

Weird stuff moves like this means there’s always money involved. 

Edited by Gapanthersfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • beckersteen
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By beckersteen · Posted

      lol we are gonna have to pay Bryce like 75mil a year now when it comes time to extend him
    • WhoKnows
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By WhoKnows · Posted

      Both Rams 1st rounders would have been Morgan’s picks. Also, if we didn’t have to trade the boat for Young, the 1st overall pick we gave away would have also been Morgan’s pick as Fitterer tied his future to Young and Young’s rookie year with Reich was going to tank Fitterer regardless. There would be no excuse to keep him longer. Also am I in the twilight zone here? Should have sold off all our talent? Are Moore, Burns and CMC still on the roster now? I feel like I would have noticed them last season.
    • WhoKnows
      Thomas Fletcher Didn’t Make It, But These Four Did

      By WhoKnows · Posted

      Seriously? A CB who missed all that time on his rookie deal and was also a top 10 pick when the guys picked right before and after have been studs. A RB our GMs tried to replace with FAs and 2nd rounders and two backup level players is one of the best drafts we’ve ever had? I’d argue that the 2011/2012 drafts were better even with just Cam and Luke/Norman. Here’s the drafts I think were better: 2017, maybe 2018, 2015, 2013, 2011, 2012, 2008, 2007, 2001, 2002 (just Pepp) I’m hoping 2025 is way better as well. Honestly, we’ve kind of sucked at drafting overall and that’s the only reason you can even remotely call Horn, Hubbard, Tremble and BC a good draft let alone one of our best ever. Good teams that draft well would laugh at that as a great draft. If you want to look at say the 2023 Lions draft, you’d get 4 stud/above average/average starters not just 3 replaceable starters/backups and a top 10 pick that missed half his games. That’s a draft that helps turn a team into a playoff team. Our record since our 2021 draft is 19-49. A best ever draft doesn’t go 19-49.
×
×
  • Create New...