Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hubbard says he might have rushed back


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd agree.

Even with Hubbard's contract? 

We have an easy out after this season with marginal dead cap. Could be smart given the situation and RB landscape. 

This part isn’t at you—but in general:

None of these guys are world beaters — sure they have been great for us at times but I just hope we don’t get this emotional investment paired with financials. I don’t think we need to teget all antsy about keeping Dowdle when he’ll be 28 next year.

I don’t mind just continuously taking a stab in the late rounds every year on one.  We should not be investing in one guy in particular when they’re not really a game breaker. See: Sanders, Hubbard, etc. 

I’d say heck yes, take a shot at a guy high up if you’re convinced you’ve landed a Gibbs or Taylor level, but otherwise, don’t invest, don’t get emotional about a 3-4 game stretch. Reset and see what type of committee you can construct with fresh legs. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

 I’d say heck yes, take a shot at a guy high up if you’re convinced you’ve landed a Gibbs or Taylor level, but otherwise, don’t invest, don’t get emotional about a 3-4 game stretch. Reset and see what type of committee you can construct with fresh legs. 

Agree with everything.  But, yeah I'll take the committee over the top draft pick.  The top draft pick RB almost never pans out.  It's early but Ashton Jeanty looks pedestrian.  Bijan Robinson is good, but was he really worth that pick?  Gibbs and Taylor are good but Gibbs is part of a tandem and has Taylor even been on a winning team?

I'm just not sure its a formula that works particularly well.  When the Eagles signed Saquon in FA they already knew that he was that guy at the NFL level.

Edited by PNW_PantherMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

We have an easy out after this season with marginal dead cap. Could be smart given the situation and RB landscape. 

This part isn’t at you—but in general:

None of these guys are world beaters — sure they have been great for us at times but I just hope we don’t get this emotional investment paired with financials. I don’t think we need to teget all antsy about keeping Dowdle when he’ll be 28 next year.

I don’t mind just continuously taking a stab in the late rounds every year on one.  We should not be investing in one guy in particular when they’re not really a game breaker. See: Sanders, Hubbard, etc. 

I’d say heck yes, take a shot at a guy high up if you’re convinced you’ve landed a Gibbs or Taylor level, but otherwise, don’t invest, don’t get emotional about a 3-4 game stretch. Reset and see what type of committee you can construct with fresh legs. 

I don't think you absolutely have to have a "world beater" if you have a stellar offensive line.

Not against fishing for a guy like that but a two back rotation behind a good set of uglies can work just as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think you absolutely have to have a "world beater" if you have a stellar offensive line.

Not against fishing for a guy like that but a two back rotation behind a good set of uglies can work just as well.

Precisely.

It’s why some teams are fine with the committees and they work out great. Others feel like they’ve found “a guy” but that’s where I caution us to jump too quickly to a conclusion just because of a few games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Agree with everything.  But, yeah I'll take the committee over the top draft pick.  The top draft pick RB almost never pans out.  It's early but Ashton Jeanty looks pedestrian.  Bijan Robinson is good, but was he really worth that pick?  Gibbs and Taylor are good but Gibbs is part of a tandem and has Taylor even been on a winning team?

I'm just not sure it’s a formula that works particularly well.  When the Eagles signed Saquon in FA they already knew that he was that guy at the NFL level.

I think Gibbs is special, but you’re right, some of the top investments have proven to not be much different than some 2nds and 3rds. Taylor for example is on an MVP level season. James Cook is doing better than Breece Hall for example.

Raiders weren’t in a good spot to draft Jeanty. Same with the Falcons/Bijan. 

You gotta swing at the right time — the investment shouldn’t come too early. You almost have to stumble into a guy mid to late rounds while building or find that guy to put you over the top when the team is finally well rounded.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No saying he mostly sucks is saying that he doesn’t suck the minority of the time.   Like if he took 17 tests and had a couple of really good showings and a handful of pretty good scores sprinkled in among the typical sub par results.   Like a golfer who went out and shot an 89.  There will be some real nice shots sprinkled in there but at the end of the day it is still 89.    
    • It's worth mentioning... Game 1: Oct 11 in Raleigh. 4-3 OT win with a complete starting lineup. Game 2: Dec 13 in Philly. 4-3 SO win without Jaccob Slavin. Game 3: Dec 14 in Raleigh. 3-2 SO win with a complete starting lineup. Game 4: Apr 13 in Philly. 3-2 SO loss with the AHL roster.  Those early season games were no indication of the Canes team that finished the season. Miller and Ehlers were still trying to figure things out, Nikishin was still a work in progress and the Stankoven line was just another line. Make no mistake, the Canes team Philly will see is nothing close to what they saw at any point in the season. If the top line starts producing, Freddie stays hot and the blue line does what it does, this could be a sweep as well.   
    • He is an employee of the team and speaking on the team's official channel. They arent critical of anything ever.
×
×
  • Create New...