Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm not sure that the reason he's not playing is due to the round he was draft in. 

I assumed it was the play that resulted in that type of QBR on the season.  Others in that range, get to keep playing for reasons that have something to do with not being a 5th round pick.   

I mean, I actually think for a 5th round pick...Rattler is a decent young body to have at your #3 or even #2 spot pending you got a solid QB you aren't looking to replace. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I assumed it was the play that resulted in that type of QBR on the season.  Others in that range, get to keep playing for reasons that have something to do with not being a 5th round pick.   

I mean, I actually think for a 5th round pick...Rattler is a decent young body to have at your #3 or even #2 spot pending you got a solid QB you aren't looking to replace. 

I tend to think coaches don't even look at QBR or any other stat. The base the decisions on performance they can see on the field and not what the stats say. I tend to agree but I don't play fantasy football where stats matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I tend to think coaches don't even look at QBR or any other stat. The base the decisions on performance they can see on the field and not what the stats say. I tend to agree but I don't play fantasy football where stats matter.

well, I think NFL teams do use stats these days.  Analytics just too big of a thing.  Now, I don't think they give a rip about ESPN's QBR.   

but do think a good team knows what there QBs completion % is going to this area of the field vs that coverage? Yes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

well, I think NFL teams do use stats these days.  Analytics just too big of a thing.  Now, I don't think they give a rip about ESPN's QBR.   

but do think a good team knows what there QBs completion % is going to this area of the field vs that coverage? Yes.  

They use it to evaluate salaries and game strategies. I don't think they use it to determine who starts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

They use it to evaluate salaries and game strategies. I don't think they use it to determine who starts. 

I mean, sure.  But to an extent.....the bad play and stats will sort of jive up often.   I do think players and coaches are aware of the stats.  I'm sure a QB at some point has heard his coach throw his awful stats in his face in anger lol.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I mean, sure.  But to an extent.....the bad play and stats will sort of jive up often.   I do think players and coaches are aware of the stats.  I'm sure a QB at some point has a QB has heard his coach throw his awful stats in his face in anger lol.  

They will tell them how many throws in a row they have missed right before they sit them out lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strato said:

That’s unfair, and bullshit. It just isn’t true. 

I mean...it kinda is 😕

It might not be a "substantial" portion, but we genuinely do have people who are still upset after games we've won because...stats.

Kinda silly in my opinion, but... 

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I tend to think coaches don't even look at QBR or any other stat. The base the decisions on performance they can see on the field and not what the stats say. I tend to agree but I don't play fantasy football where stats matter.

Depends on the coach, but in my opinion that's how the smart coaches operate.

I don't really see Andy Reid or Sean McVay going by a stat sheet.

24 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

They use it to evaluate salaries and game strategies. 

That's probably more guys like Suleiman and Tilis than it is coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Depends on the coach, but in my opinion that's how the smart coaches operate.

I don't really see Andy Reid or Sean McVay going by a stat sheet.

That's probably more guys like Suleiman and Tilis than it is coaches.

I'm talking about the folks that actually use the stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I mean...it kinda is 😕

It might not be a "substantial" portion, but we genuinely do have people who are still upset after games we've won because...stats.

Kinda silly in my opinion, but... 

I don't think that's intellectually honest of the view at all...

I think the people you deem are "unhappy" with stats......just stay fixated on the the big picture and to actually matter in the NFL going forward, you need more offensive production and more threatening play from the QB spot....if the goal is to be consistently relevant in the future and present a real threat to win the league on an ongoing basis (which is supposed to the goal and mission you are building toward)

Finding our way to a random 9 win season......without the inspiration belief we are on the way to achieve what we want .....just doesn't actually mean much. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

I don't think that's intellectually honest of the view at all...

I think the people you deem are "unhappy" with stats......just stay fixated on the the big picture and to actually matter in the NFL going forward, you need more offensive production and more threatening play from the QB spot....if the goal is to be consistently relevant in the future and present a real threat to win the league on an ongoing basis. 

Finding our way to a random 9 win season......without the inspiration belief we are on the way to achieve what we want .....just doesn't actually mean much. 

No. It's pretty much what I said. People don't wanna admit it because it sounds silly..which it is.

As has been repeated many times, my evaluation of Bryce and why I think he should be a backup rather than a starter, isn't stat based.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

No. It's pretty much what I said. People don't wanna admit it because it sounds silly..which it is.

As has been repeated many times, my evaluation of Bryce and why I think he should be a backup rather than a starter, isn't stat based.

I mean, you are doing here what you do.  

but yeah, the people you are "addressing" here don't think as you want to portray them.   No one actually gives a fug about literal stats.  

threatening play and overall load carrying ability of an offense matter when it comes to a QB.  Especially, if your goal is to build a really good football team.  Thats generally the fixation of most teams.  Find that dude that can carry a team if need be and good enough to win a Super Bowl.  

Sometimes stats get talked about just because it is an easy way to talk on a message board about QBs that don't got what they are looking for and don't view as the answer. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...