Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

ESPN has this qualifier. 

To qualify, a player must have at least 14 attempts per team's games played

  • Statistics are updated nightly

NFL.com does not and it has Gunner and Cam Akers with the best rating.  Just another reason why pure stats are silly.  Funny enough neither of them remove data from games players didn't start or finish.  Weird right?

data manipulation! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, CRA said:

from my perspective, I call looking at quarterbacks starts when talking about him....and someone calling that manipulating the data, a wild take though.   Think it's the most accurate way to view what you get out of a QB when his team and the opposing team both have game planned w/ that QB in mind and you have the full game.  All these random bits of games distort the statistics IMO. 

What does saying Shough is playing surprisingly well mean? Literally nothing outside of our next opponent has a rookie playing surprisingly well (and it's enough we can't dismiss that after a very surprising first game vs us).   

and it's not a favor done just for him.  I've always taken out the random games form dudes when talking about them when the sample size is small.  I mean, ask PJ Walker to come in a blowout or start a game and IMO you get 2 very different things out of PJ Walker.   If you are playing against him next week, it's probably best to acknowledge the variant that starts vs inserted late.    

It's pretty simple as they are very close.  When you look at season totals Bryce barely beats him in a few stats.  When you look at starts he barely beats Bryce.  Most of the major sites have their data listed by season totals but you are looking at starts as it helps your case.  That's all.  Regardless they are playing close with Bo Nix right there as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

It's pretty simple as they are very close.  When you look at season totals Bryce barely beats him in a few stats.  When you look at starts he barely beats Bryce.  Most of the major sites have their data listed by season totals but you are looking at starts as it helps your case.  That's all.  Regardless they are playing close with Bo Nix right there as well. 

it's not so much my case, as IMO you suggest I am uniquely doing something here for Shough...... but how I simply have always talked about QBs.   Specifically, ones that haven't started all season.  I have done that with basically everyone for years.  

I mean, I guess my point is, you can disagree with caring about starts and think backup player garbage time games is just as important of data and shouldn't be separated.   I'm just saying I'm not uniquely doing it for Shough.   That's what I always do.  I have done it with all the Panthers QBs over the years that weren't starters the full season. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

it's not so much my case, as IMO you suggest I am uniquely doing something here for Shough...... but how I simply have always talked about QBs.   Specifically, ones that haven't started all season.  I have done that with basically everyone for years.  

I mean, I guess my point is, you can disagree with caring about starts and think backup player garbage time games is just as important of data and shouldn't be separated.   I'm just saying I'm not uniquely doing it for Shough.   That's what I always do.  I have done it with all the Panthers QBs over the years that weren't starters the full season. 

 

Regardless most lists are not removing data from games players missed part of whether they got hurt or came off the bench.  I don't think people are removing the game Bryce came off the bench when they are looking at this totals last year.  It's typically cumulative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I think without manipulating the data, Gunner is the GOAT

Exactly.  Which means data.... doesn't always tell the whole story!  Congrats we are officially fully circle again.  Love talking in circles with you.  Data without context is pointless.  You can also skew it to tell whatever story you want, like looking at just games a player starts, GWDs, PFF etc...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Regardless most lists are not removing data from games players missed part of whether they got hurt or came off the bench.  I don't think people are removing the game Bryce came off the bench when they are looking at this totals last year.  It's typically cumulative.

yeah, and in this case, people wanted to talk about a full time starter vs a guy that had garbage time games mixed in.  

I would wager a fun bet, I can find a post of mine, where I did that very thing for Bryce Young last year and edited those games out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, and in this case, people wanted to talk about a full time starter vs a guy that had garbage time games mixed in.  

I would wager a fun bet, I can find a post of mine, where I did that very thing for Bryce Young last year and edited those games out. 

If you actually edited those games out every time you mention his last season stats then more power to you.  That's not the norm as most people just pull the stats from major sites like ESPN and NFL.com.  

Have fun looking at your posts for it.  Maybe you will see how fixated you have become on a certain topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

If you actually edited those games out every time you mention his last season stats then more power to you.  That's not the norm as most people just pull the stats from major sites like ESPN and NFL.com.  

Have fun looking at your posts for it.  Maybe you will see how fixated you have become on a certain topic.

Didn’t do it every time for Bryce’s   Didn’t do it every time with PJ Walker.  But pending the convo, sometimes it was warranted in certain convos and discussions. 

I would assume the Panthers aren’t spending lots of time on the 2 games he game in during the 4th and 3rd q during film study… and are spending most of their time studying the games he started in.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

 the Bryce stans basically have been ripping off the Skip/The Golden Calf of Bristol argument.   It doesn't matter if he is below average 98% of his snaps.  That 2%!!!

Don't know that I buy this as being true, but hey if that formula wins games, I'll take it 😄

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Well, if that formula wins games, I'll take it 😄

I mean, that’s sort of the point.  We all know the Skip logic was garbage and that’s why Tim is on TV.  Yet here we are….acting like Brycemania is something different 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...