Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With these FA moves, PFF guys don't know who to mock to us


TD alt
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

They like Wallace as the green dot and running the defense. Inside the building probably thinks LB is set. 

I highly doubt this is the case. If we have a chance to add someone like Jacob Rodriguez in the 2nd round we better damn well take it.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For as much as some of you are classifying DT as a need, I think it's in the rest of the bucket with everything besides OT. Still, I think that there has to be someone that warrants the pick for us to pick him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The current plan is for him to go into this season wearing the green dot and being on the field for a super high snap count. 

🤷‍♂️

 

The team completely (along with the players) give him credit for the defenses improved play after he took over the green dot. 

Edited by carpanfan96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

The current plan is for him to go into this season wearing the green dot and being on the field for a super high snap count. 

🤷‍♂️

 

The team completely (along with the players) give him credit for the defenses improved play after he took over the green dot. 

Well that's nice and all, but he's an awful player. If they're so impressed with him wearing the green dot then make him a coach.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He did green dot in 2024.  
I don’t question he may be a good dude and show some leadership. 

How long does it take someone to learn to find the ball and tackle the guy with the ball? Because that is where he sucks. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, strato said:

He did green dot in 2024.  
I don’t question he may be a good dude and show some leadership. 

How long does it take someone to learn to find the ball and tackle the guy with the ball? Because that is where he sucks. 

After he took over calling the defense he had 43 tackles, 2 sacks and 3 pd in 8 games. Not exactly bad numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

After he took over calling the defense he had 43 tackles, 2 sacks and 3 pd in 8 games. Not exactly bad numbers. 

Maybe you are right about the coaches liking him. To me, he was the guy standing on the edge of the pile. Slow to get to the ball. Late to the party. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Well that's nice and all, but he's an awful player. If they're so impressed with him wearing the green dot then make him a coach.

"Awful" seems a bit hyperbolic. He has made plays at times. He's just "awful" in coverage.

Edited by TD alt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TD alt said:

"Awful" seems a bit hyperbolic. He has made plays at times. He's just "awful" in coverage.

Lloyd next to Wallace gives them two lb that can blitz well and get sacks from inside as well as better coverage so they don't have to rely on Wallace to always drop into zone, they'll be able to get him downhill attacking the los more comparatively to what they did last year. Also adding Philips means Scranton sees less double teams and should open him up as a pass rusher and allows them to bring Princely on the field on obvious passing downs to rush the passer because they can move Phillips down onto the line in those situations. 

 

So on obvious passing downs the front seven will probably look like this majority of the time. 

Edge - Scourton 

Dt - Philips 

NT- Brown

Dt - Wharton

Edge - Umanmielen/Jones 

ILB - Lloyd

ILB - Wallace

Edited by carpanfan96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, h0llywood said:

With all these signings addressing most of our needs, the only position I would not like to see in the 1st is a WR. If Makai Lemon happens to fall to 19, that would only hinder Coker's progress.

I have been listening to analysts, and receiver is surely in the mix (as well as it should be). X appears to be a bust, and people outside of the Huddle aren't looking at Coker as a sure-fire WR2. 

I think we're going BPA (and that's exactly what we should be doing).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bleacher Report trade and mock has us trading to 9 and picking SG Brayden Burries Charlotte Hornets recieve: Kyrie Irving and No. 9 pick Dallas Mavericks receive: LaMelo Ball, No. 14 pick and No. 18 pick The Hornets just finished their sixth season with Ball. It was only their second with a winning record, their sixth without a playoff trip and the sixth in which someone else paced them in win shares (Kon Knueppel this time around). While they'd surely like to keep building on their second-half momentum, maybe they're just unconvinced that Ball can lead a winning team. Maybe they credit that stretch run less to him and more to the addition of Knueppel, the ascension of Brandon Miller and some out-of-nowhere gains on the defensive end.   Charlotte should be dreaming big right now, and perhaps it believes a steadier hand at point guard is needed to realize that. Or maybe it feels it needs a little more time to bring everything together and thinks that task would be simpler without Ball's money on the books and with a top-10 pick in a loaded draft instead of two selections in the mid-teens.   Either way, this shakeup works. Short-term, a healthy Irving should be far easier to follow than Ball. You may not always know if Irving is playing, but you know what you'll get if he does: elite shotmaking, all-time handles, offensive ingenuity and the ability to work both on and off the ball. He could show this young roster what's required to win for a year or two (he has a $42.4 million player option for 2027-28) or even stick around longer if the partnership proves especially fruitful.   The Hornets also add a building block in Burries, who offers both plug-and-play polish and flashes of shot-creation that hint at star potential. In short, they could better their chances of winning both now and in the future while collecting both the best player in the trade and the highest draft pic
    • I'd hire him in a heartbeat. Hell if he wanted the job, I'd have Canales packing his poo right now and I don't dislike Canales. It's just that firing a 106-58 coach is crazy work. That's a 65% winning percentage. That's the equivalent of averaging 11 wins a season. That's incomprehensible for a fanbase That's never experienced back to back winning seaons.
×
×
  • Create New...