Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton's apology for "entertainment and icon" statement


blackcatgrowl

Recommended Posts

Everyone recognises that and only the ignorant would hold it over him.

That said, he said it, it was a mistake and it either shows a lack of judgement, preparation or appreciation of the situation he is in.

It's only magnified because there are other things preceding it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say he was naive and too trusting of Peter King, rather than had a lack of appreciation of his situation.

Possibly, although they were the ones setting up the interview. If he was naive, it just shows he wasn't prepared well enough.

It's not a huge issue, but it's just another reference for people to ask questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is a charming guy....great smile. Obviously great athlete. Anyone know his wonderlic score? I think that is important in evaluating whether a very good spread QB can make it as an NFL QB.

I do think that Peter King was wrong to take Cam's statement out of context and tweet it. He wanted to make news making Cam look bad. Not the action of a responsible journalist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it's called being "misquoted and taken out of context."

Yep.

And even when a Hall of Fame Running Back puts the comment in the correct context, he still apologizes.

If he was as arrogant as some people seem to think he is, he could have said, "Yeah, Marshal Faulk is right. I was taken out of Context. Peter King was wrong to mis-quote me.".

Instead, he took the High Road and said he could have used other words to better describe how he felt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is a charming guy....great smile. Obviously great athlete. Anyone know his wonderlic score? I think that is important in evaluating whether a very good spread QB can make it as an NFL QB.

I do think that Peter King was wrong to take Cam's statement out of context and tweet it. He wanted to make news making Cam look bad. Not the action of a responsible journalist.

No such thing a a responsible journalist. That is like saying there are responsible news casters. They want what everyone wants when they go to work, and that is money and money comes from getting people's attention. For king it was shitting on Newton, for News it's Murders, Rapes usually the shock value type stuff. He never took Cam out of context, he let the media do that for him. Not very respectful but then again, it's how these guys work and Cam was ignorant not knowing that, but he knows, or does now.

I am also curious to his wonderlic score. Something tells me it isn't very good. I said it before and I really think intelligence/football IQ is his biggest issue, forget about character, does he have the brains?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...