Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Davis Mock draft: Panthers pull surprise by taking Newton No. 1


blackcatgrowl

Recommended Posts

NFL.com Analyst's Mock Draft below.

http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000d5d81e9431a/article/mock-draft-panthers-pull-surprise-by-taking-newton-no-1?module=HP_cp2

1. Carolina Panthers

Cam Newton, QB, Auburn

The "Force Majeure" for college football in 2010 is now the hotly debated first overall pick in 2011.

2. Denver Broncos

Nick Fairley, DT, Auburn

The best defender for the national champs gives new defensive-oriented coach John Fox a nice start in Denver.

3. Buffalo Bills

Da'Quan Bowers, DE, Clemson

Might have been hoping that Newton would still be available, but good pass rushers are always welcomed.

4. Cincinnati Bengals

A.J. Green, WR, Georgia

The best wide receiver in the draft could entice Carson Palmer to stick around for awhile.

5. Arizona Cardinals

Blaine Gabbert, QB, Missouri

Will need the Larry Fitzgerald stamp of approval, but many believe this young man is the class of the QBs in this draft.

6. Cleveland Browns

Robert Quinn, DE/OLB, North Carolina

New regime in Cleveland, and new defensive coordinator Dick Jauron gets another building block.

7. San Francisco 49ers

Patrick Peterson, CB, LSU

He has size, speed, range, and can return kicks.

8. Tennessee Titans

Marcell Dareus, DT, Alabama

Many think he is the equal of Fairley, maybe better.

9. Dallas Cowboys

Anthony Castanzo, OT, Boston College

Offensive line is a place Dallas is continuing to try to fortify.

10. Washington Redskins

Von Miller, OLB, Texas A&M

Showed at the Senior Bowl and combine that he can do it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im so sick of seeing/hearing/reading that the Panthers are going to take Newton first overall. Too many quality selections to take a project number 1. If I had to choose Revis vs. Manning, I'd take Manning... but if I had to choose Revis over Russell, I'd take Revis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im so sick of seeing/hearing/reading that the Panthers are going to take Newton first overall. Too many quality selections to take a project number 1. If I had to choose Revis vs. Manning, I'd take Manning... but if I had to choose Revis over Russell, I'd take Revis.

where was russell drafted? where was revis drafted? apperently just about everybody in the NFL would have taken Russell over Revis at the time of the draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll pull a surprise my murdering the next thing I see if that happens on draft day.

y? hes the best QB. He can scramble too which is obviously better than clausen sitting in the pocket for 20 seconds and not doing poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

y? hes the best QB. He can scramble too which is obviously better than clausen sitting in the pocket for 20 seconds and not doing poo.

If i were to be able to interpreted this ill-advised post correctly, you think Newton is the best Quarterback? :dupe:

He couldn't even hit receivers being covered by there shadows at the combine... he is a bust waiting to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't wait until Freddie McFootball releases his Mock Draft so we get another pointless mock draft thread.

I mean think about this. It's like a Pro-Newton guy will ask a Homeless Guy on the street and if that Homeless Guy says Fig Newton, we'll get a thread "HOMELESS GUY HAS THE PANTHERS TAKING CAM "FIG" NEWTON #1 OVERALL"

Ridiculous is it not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's right...keep comparing Russell to Newton. Pretty much ever analysts and scout out there knows that is a bogus comparison, since Russell showed up at the combine overweight and unmotivated, and Newton showed up in shape and ready to compete but whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If i were to be able to interpreted this ill-advised post correctly, you think Newton is the best Quarterback? :dupe:

He couldn't even hit receivers being covered by there shadows at the combine... he is a bust waiting to happen.

Yes, because throwing to different random Receivers you've never thrown to before is entirely on the QB for performance.

Do you realize that many QBs aren't throwing at the combine because there is a growing thought that it isn't a fair test?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait...I thought you guys keep claiming the media is against Cam...:rolleyes:

Hmm. Maybe you should read up in the other threads how we now have two stories about his Combine interviews and one is being called out as a fraud (that would be the one in the negative)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

y? hes the best QB. He can scramble too which is obviously better than clausen sitting in the pocket for 20 seconds and not doing poo.

Peterson, Dareus, Green, Fairley, Bowers, Quinn or even Gabbert would be better choices than Newton imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...