Beason: Cam For No.1, Has "It" Factor

[mav1234]

You told me the other day he was nothing like Vick. You said "terrible comparison" to quote you exactly. Guess you are changing your mind.

Physically he is nothing like Michael Vick. The way he played the game in college is similar. How he'll do in the NFL is something completely different because of the talent disparity between college and NFL defenses.

[teeray]

Physically he is nothing like Michael Vick. The way he played the game in college is similar. How he'll do in the NFL is something completely different because of the talent disparity between college and NFL defenses.

I know. I was referring to TRD changing up his stories not the larger comparison.

Point well taken though.

[TheRealDeal]

You told me the other day he was nothing like Vick. You said "terrible comparison" to quote you exactly. Guess you are changing your mind.

Physically he is nothing like Michael Vick. The way he played the game in college is similar. How he'll do in the NFL is something completely different because of the talent disparity between college and NFL defenses.

I know. I was referring to TRD changing up his stories not the larger comparison.

Point well taken though.

Yes this comparison is for something different than what we were talking about before. The other comparison was I believe related to quickness and speed.

This comparison is referring to the tendency to be a runner and not really a passer, like White, The Golden Calf of Bristol, VY, etc.

If you had to group him into a bucket, he's much more similar to those four guys than he is Freeman, Rodgers, Ben, etc

[Montsta]

My biggest concern with Cam is when we are visitors in a dome and Chud is calling plays and Cam can't hear because of his abnormally tiny ears.

Aside from that, if Beason likes him, I'd like to change my vote from No-Cam to a vote of present instead.

[monstercat]

Most people who do it for a living say we shouldn't take him at #1 and in fact most say that Gabbert is better than him.

That's not entirely true. They may not have him at #1, but even Mayock admitted that it wouldn't be unreasonable for the Panthers to take either Gabbert or Newton at #1.

Anyway, what's the difference really between #1 and #10, when it comes to QB's? Nobody is drafting a QB at #10 if they don't think he can do it.

[TheRealDeal]

My biggest concern with Cam is when we are visitors in a dome and Chud is calling plays and Cam can't hear because of his abnormally tiny ears.

Aside from that, if Beason likes him, I'd like to change my vote from No-Cam to a vote of present instead.

Cam would help reduce the ugly in our QB stable and if we brought him in and released Pike and Clausen we could very well be respectable.

If we drafted him, traded for Palmer, and brought back Moore, we might very well be #1, despite Cam's tiny ears.

This is one of the few reasons I am okay with drafting Cam.

I still think we can fix the ugly without him.

And just in case anyone is confused thinking ugly means ugly play by QBs, no, I literally mean ugly as in appearances of our QBs faces.

Semi Homo

[teeray]

Cam would help reduce the ugly in our QB stable and if we brought him in and released Pike and Clausen we could very well be respectable.

If we drafted him, traded for Palmer, and brought back Moore, we might very well be #1, despite Cam's tiny ears.

This is one of the few reasons I am okay with drafting Cam.

I still think we can fix the ugly without him.

And just in case anyone is confused thinking ugly means ugly play by QBs, no, I literally mean ugly as in appearances of our QBs faces.

Semi Homo

May be the best post I have seen in my time here. Very well thought out and makes more sense the halve the sh*t we have been saying. :D

[TheRealDeal]

That's not entirely true. They may not have him at #1, but even Mayock admitted that it wouldn't be unreasonable for the Panthers to take either Gabbert or Newton at #1.

Anyway, what's the difference really between #1 and #10, when it comes to QB's? Nobody is drafting a QB at #10 if they don't think he can do it.

Money, expectations, commitment, etc

Being a QB that is supposed to go at 12-15 in a down year for the draft as a whole isn't a glowing endorsement for why you should go #1, please stop using that.

[TheRealDeal]

May be the best post I have seen in my time here. Very well thought out and makes more sense the halve the sh*t we have been saying. :D

Their nicknames would be Butt-Chin, Ears, and Teeth, all minor flaws in what would be a wonderful collection of faces.

[monstercat]

Money.

Fixed it for you.:wink:

[Montsta]

This is one of the few reasons I am okay with drafting Cam.

I still think we can fix the ugly without him.

And just in case anyone is confused thinking ugly means ugly play by QBs, no, I literally mean ugly as in appearances of our QBs faces.

Semi Homo

Quarter chub?

[Proudiddy]

Yeah, he might not draft for us, but I'm sure Clausen enjoys that vote of confidence, lol. So much for apologizing to Beason after the games this year. :lol:

[Darth Urious]

[TheRealDeal]

Fixed it for you.:wink:

You don't think commitment to that player and expectations from that player are different?