Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Beason: Cam For No.1, Has "It" Factor

pantherfan81

By pantherfan81,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

You told me the other day he was nothing like Vick. You said "terrible comparison" to quote you exactly. Guess you are changing your mind.

Physically he is nothing like Michael Vick. The way he played the game in college is similar. How he'll do in the NFL is something completely different because of the talent disparity between college and NFL defenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Enthusiast

teeray

Posted
Posted

Physically he is nothing like Michael Vick. The way he played the game in college is similar. How he'll do in the NFL is something completely different because of the talent disparity between college and NFL defenses.

I know. I was referring to TRD changing up his stories not the larger comparison.

Point well taken though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

You told me the other day he was nothing like Vick. You said "terrible comparison" to quote you exactly. Guess you are changing your mind.

Physically he is nothing like Michael Vick. The way he played the game in college is similar. How he'll do in the NFL is something completely different because of the talent disparity between college and NFL defenses.

I know. I was referring to TRD changing up his stories not the larger comparison.

Point well taken though.

Yes this comparison is for something different than what we were talking about before. The other comparison was I believe related to quickness and speed.

This comparison is referring to the tendency to be a runner and not really a passer, like White, The Golden Calf of Bristol, VY, etc.

If you had to group him into a bucket, he's much more similar to those four guys than he is Freeman, Rodgers, Ben, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Rising Star

Montsta

Posted
Posted

My biggest concern with Cam is when we are visitors in a dome and Chud is calling plays and Cam can't hear because of his abnormally tiny ears.

Aside from that, if Beason likes him, I'd like to change my vote from No-Cam to a vote of present instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
monstercat Newbie

monstercat

Posted
Posted

Most people who do it for a living say we shouldn't take him at #1 and in fact most say that Gabbert is better than him.

That's not entirely true. They may not have him at #1, but even Mayock admitted that it wouldn't be unreasonable for the Panthers to take either Gabbert or Newton at #1.

Anyway, what's the difference really between #1 and #10, when it comes to QB's? Nobody is drafting a QB at #10 if they don't think he can do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

My biggest concern with Cam is when we are visitors in a dome and Chud is calling plays and Cam can't hear because of his abnormally tiny ears.

Aside from that, if Beason likes him, I'd like to change my vote from No-Cam to a vote of present instead.

Cam would help reduce the ugly in our QB stable and if we brought him in and released Pike and Clausen we could very well be respectable.

If we drafted him, traded for Palmer, and brought back Moore, we might very well be #1, despite Cam's tiny ears.

This is one of the few reasons I am okay with drafting Cam.

I still think we can fix the ugly without him.

And just in case anyone is confused thinking ugly means ugly play by QBs, no, I literally mean ugly as in appearances of our QBs faces.

Semi Homo

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Enthusiast

teeray

Posted
Posted

Cam would help reduce the ugly in our QB stable and if we brought him in and released Pike and Clausen we could very well be respectable.

If we drafted him, traded for Palmer, and brought back Moore, we might very well be #1, despite Cam's tiny ears.

This is one of the few reasons I am okay with drafting Cam.

I still think we can fix the ugly without him.

And just in case anyone is confused thinking ugly means ugly play by QBs, no, I literally mean ugly as in appearances of our QBs faces.

Semi Homo

May be the best post I have seen in my time here. Very well thought out and makes more sense the halve the sh*t we have been saying. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

That's not entirely true. They may not have him at #1, but even Mayock admitted that it wouldn't be unreasonable for the Panthers to take either Gabbert or Newton at #1.

Anyway, what's the difference really between #1 and #10, when it comes to QB's? Nobody is drafting a QB at #10 if they don't think he can do it.

Money, expectations, commitment, etc

Being a QB that is supposed to go at 12-15 in a down year for the draft as a whole isn't a glowing endorsement for why you should go #1, please stop using that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Rising Star

Montsta

Posted
Posted

This is one of the few reasons I am okay with drafting Cam.

I still think we can fix the ugly without him.

And just in case anyone is confused thinking ugly means ugly play by QBs, no, I literally mean ugly as in appearances of our QBs faces.

Semi Homo

Quarter chub?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      Give Legette another season?

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Packersfan
      Week 16 NFL games

      By Packersfan · Posted

      Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      Chad ‘Ochstradamus’ Johnson and Shannon Sharpe on Panthers

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      Nah we just talking about giving a platform and normalizing predators (who both beat women) opinions and celebrating it if it fits your narrative.  If that's fun I'm fine being a miserable fug by not supporting P.O.S like that. N b4 you call me a libtard or some other dumb ish know I'm an Anarchist/Libertarian and believe both these dudes should get a complete ass whooping (at min) or something worse for what they have done to women in this world. 
×
×
  • Create New...