Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Beason: Cam For No.1, Has "It" Factor

pantherfan81

By pantherfan81,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

You told me the other day he was nothing like Vick. You said "terrible comparison" to quote you exactly. Guess you are changing your mind.

Physically he is nothing like Michael Vick. The way he played the game in college is similar. How he'll do in the NFL is something completely different because of the talent disparity between college and NFL defenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Contributor

teeray

Posted
Posted

Physically he is nothing like Michael Vick. The way he played the game in college is similar. How he'll do in the NFL is something completely different because of the talent disparity between college and NFL defenses.

I know. I was referring to TRD changing up his stories not the larger comparison.

Point well taken though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

You told me the other day he was nothing like Vick. You said "terrible comparison" to quote you exactly. Guess you are changing your mind.

Physically he is nothing like Michael Vick. The way he played the game in college is similar. How he'll do in the NFL is something completely different because of the talent disparity between college and NFL defenses.

I know. I was referring to TRD changing up his stories not the larger comparison.

Point well taken though.

Yes this comparison is for something different than what we were talking about before. The other comparison was I believe related to quickness and speed.

This comparison is referring to the tendency to be a runner and not really a passer, like White, The Golden Calf of Bristol, VY, etc.

If you had to group him into a bucket, he's much more similar to those four guys than he is Freeman, Rodgers, Ben, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Rising Star

Montsta

Posted
Posted

My biggest concern with Cam is when we are visitors in a dome and Chud is calling plays and Cam can't hear because of his abnormally tiny ears.

Aside from that, if Beason likes him, I'd like to change my vote from No-Cam to a vote of present instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
monstercat Newbie

monstercat

Posted
Posted

Most people who do it for a living say we shouldn't take him at #1 and in fact most say that Gabbert is better than him.

That's not entirely true. They may not have him at #1, but even Mayock admitted that it wouldn't be unreasonable for the Panthers to take either Gabbert or Newton at #1.

Anyway, what's the difference really between #1 and #10, when it comes to QB's? Nobody is drafting a QB at #10 if they don't think he can do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

My biggest concern with Cam is when we are visitors in a dome and Chud is calling plays and Cam can't hear because of his abnormally tiny ears.

Aside from that, if Beason likes him, I'd like to change my vote from No-Cam to a vote of present instead.

Cam would help reduce the ugly in our QB stable and if we brought him in and released Pike and Clausen we could very well be respectable.

If we drafted him, traded for Palmer, and brought back Moore, we might very well be #1, despite Cam's tiny ears.

This is one of the few reasons I am okay with drafting Cam.

I still think we can fix the ugly without him.

And just in case anyone is confused thinking ugly means ugly play by QBs, no, I literally mean ugly as in appearances of our QBs faces.

Semi Homo

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Contributor

teeray

Posted
Posted

Cam would help reduce the ugly in our QB stable and if we brought him in and released Pike and Clausen we could very well be respectable.

If we drafted him, traded for Palmer, and brought back Moore, we might very well be #1, despite Cam's tiny ears.

This is one of the few reasons I am okay with drafting Cam.

I still think we can fix the ugly without him.

And just in case anyone is confused thinking ugly means ugly play by QBs, no, I literally mean ugly as in appearances of our QBs faces.

Semi Homo

May be the best post I have seen in my time here. Very well thought out and makes more sense the halve the sh*t we have been saying. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

That's not entirely true. They may not have him at #1, but even Mayock admitted that it wouldn't be unreasonable for the Panthers to take either Gabbert or Newton at #1.

Anyway, what's the difference really between #1 and #10, when it comes to QB's? Nobody is drafting a QB at #10 if they don't think he can do it.

Money, expectations, commitment, etc

Being a QB that is supposed to go at 12-15 in a down year for the draft as a whole isn't a glowing endorsement for why you should go #1, please stop using that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Rising Star

Montsta

Posted
Posted

This is one of the few reasons I am okay with drafting Cam.

I still think we can fix the ugly without him.

And just in case anyone is confused thinking ugly means ugly play by QBs, no, I literally mean ugly as in appearances of our QBs faces.

Semi Homo

Quarter chub?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      I didn't move the goal posts. But anyone who follows football who wants to engage in a rational discussion can't argue that 10 7th round picks are equal to 10 1st rounders in value. The argument has always been we haven't spent as much on defense has we have on offense. Draft picks have value just like salary. We have not spent the same amount of draft pick salary cap on defense that we have on offense since drafting Bryce. It's not even close. Just the 2 1sts we used on Bryce, 2 overall 1sts have a value of 6000. That doesn’t even factor in DJ Moore or the 2 2nds. Bryce cost more than everything we've spent on defense in 6 damn years. 
    • raleigh-panther
      Canales and Darnold

      By raleigh-panther · Posted

      We need to hope this scenario plays our next week he fails with pressure…what that means with Evero, is beyond me
    • raleigh-panther
      The Case for(or Against) Drafting/Signing a TE

      By raleigh-panther · Posted

      Woukd be a great addition You know the issues from my prespective, 2 things the Panthers must do 1. Edge or pass rushers or 2 oline or 3 oline or as Andy Reid says, when in doubt, draft a lineman it is time   That oline is troubling plus a small person at QB  they   1. Can do a lot better than mayes at center, 2. and lewis has had injuries all season. 3. Moton should not have  been resigned long term, 4. corbett is a shadow and will probably be released  5 and Christianson coming off Achilles   6 and the kicker, would be Ickey’s contract if they decide to keep him INMO rookie and contracts will be needed to offset all that 
×
×
  • Create New...