Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What decertification means to QBs in the draft


pantherfan81

Recommended Posts

The decertification of the NFLPA could have a dramatic influence on this year’s draft as far as quarterbacks are concerned. With no CBA in place and the players being locked out that means that there will be no OTA’s or offseason programs. This will have an effect on all the rookies as they will be way behind once training camp finally begins. The position that will be influenced the most is the quarterback position, and it could also have an effect as to where they are drafted.

None of the quarterbacks in this class played in a predominantly pro-style offense in college. Clubs would have used the offseason program and the OTA’s to work on the mechanics of the rookies and to give them time to learn their offenses. Without that valuable instruction period, how much value will a rookie quarterback have to a club? Their rookie years could be a wash, and if a club has a choice to draft a quarterback who won’t play versus a player who will give them some production they may choose the latter. In scouting there is always a difference of opinion, and I am one who has felt for a long time that none of the top quarterbacks in this class are on par with some of the top quarterbacks in previous classes. I feel Cam Newton is the most talented quarterback in the class and a winner on the field but I don’t trust his off-field behavior. If a club takes him in the top 5 they are saying that he will be the face of the franchise and with his off-field concerns (that have been documented) is this the player a club wants to be their leader? The club that drafts Newton will have answered that question internally. The other quarterback that has gotten a lot of play to be drafted early is Blaine Gabbert of Missouri. While he is talented, he is not close to being a starting NFL quarterback....

Read More

Pretty good read, plus gives some more insight on Gabbert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not dropping to the third, and he's not going to be a Panther. He's not a #1 overall pick, and nobody who actually likes the guy wants him to be. The only people rooting for him at #1 are people who are convinced we have to take a quarterback and are scared shitless of taking Cam Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not dropping to the third, and he's not going to be a Panther. He's not a #1 overall pick, and nobody who actually likes the guy wants him to be. The only people rooting for him at #1 are people who are convinced we have to take a quarterback and are scared pooless of taking Cam Newton.

I'm scared shitless about taking either Cam or Gabbert, but in my humble opinion, I think we need a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of interesting tweets on the QB's (paraphrasing)...

Gabbert is headed home to St. Louis, and it sounds as if he will not be returning to his QB camp. Said he enjoyed his time there, etc.

George Witfield was asked if the lockout mean that Newton would stop training until a settlement was reached. He replied "no", that Cam is continuing to work as if nothing had changed.

Maybe nothing, but I think it says something about work ethic and desire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it doesn't. Gabbert's pro day is in 4 days, he was going home to prepare for it. He'll likely be working out afterwards with Stitzel or whatever his name is that he was preparing with through college.

Gabbert was not only playing for Missouri but preparing to take snaps from under center with another QB coach in his spare time. I would be surprised if he did not return to work with that person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it doesn't. Gabbert's pro day is in 4 days, he was going home to prepare for it. He'll likely be working out afterwards with Stitzel or whatever his name is that he was preparing with through college.

Gabbert was not only playing for Missouri but preparing to take snaps from under center with another QB coach in his spare time. I would be surprised if he did not return to work with that person.

You're probably right. He only indicated that he had finished his workouts in Phoenix. Maybe he will still train in Columbia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I want scouting on a QB coming out of college, I would rather someone who has been right about QBs more than once in a 25 year career. In his 25 years, he oversaw the drafting of such HOF QBs as...

Dave Walter

Mike Perez

Craig Kupp

Larry Wanke

Dave Brown*

Kent Graham

Danny Kanell

Mike Cherry

Rex Grossman*

Kyle Orton

*1st round picks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...