Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marcell Dareus on First Take


Panthers128

Recommended Posts

Because if we don't take a QB at #1, we're not going to change QBs at all, right?

Seriously, guys :rolleyes:

Haha. Very true. And for all we know, teh Jimmy can win that camp battle and upgrade to game manager. If we don't take a QB first, it doesn't automatically condemn our offense. It's not like any of these QB's are going to start from day one and become an effective signal caller their rookie season, especially if this lockout eats away training camp and OTA's and rookie mini camps etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Super duper! Our defense will be air tight. No one will score more than 10 points on us.

Too bad we'll still lose, as we can only score 3, or sometimes 7.

For everyone who continues to cry offense offense offense...

Our offense was regularly one of the bottom offenses in the league under Fox.

2010 - 12.2 ppg

2009 - 19.7

2008 - 25.9

2007 - 16.7

2006 - 16.9

2005 - 24.4

2004 - 22.2

2003 - 20.3

2002 - 16.1

(source NFL.com)

Much of our problems on offense can be directly attributed to the lack of creativity and game planning by Fox and Co. Our overall average with him is 19.4ppg. Offense is clearly not his strength.

We have a great OL, a great stable of RBs. We have some decent, young receivers, and an a bunch of unknowns at QB. Further, the general consensus is that we need a vet QB regardless of if we take a QB at #1. It's very likely that our offense will be much better, with the same personnel, because of our coaching turnover. We won't suddenly turn into the Packers, but you can be damn sure we won't be held to 12.2ppg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...