Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marcell Dareus on First Take


Panthers128

Recommended Posts

Because if we don't take a QB at #1, we're not going to change QBs at all, right?

Seriously, guys :rolleyes:

Haha. Very true. And for all we know, teh Jimmy can win that camp battle and upgrade to game manager. If we don't take a QB first, it doesn't automatically condemn our offense. It's not like any of these QB's are going to start from day one and become an effective signal caller their rookie season, especially if this lockout eats away training camp and OTA's and rookie mini camps etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Super duper! Our defense will be air tight. No one will score more than 10 points on us.

Too bad we'll still lose, as we can only score 3, or sometimes 7.

For everyone who continues to cry offense offense offense...

Our offense was regularly one of the bottom offenses in the league under Fox.

2010 - 12.2 ppg

2009 - 19.7

2008 - 25.9

2007 - 16.7

2006 - 16.9

2005 - 24.4

2004 - 22.2

2003 - 20.3

2002 - 16.1

(source NFL.com)

Much of our problems on offense can be directly attributed to the lack of creativity and game planning by Fox and Co. Our overall average with him is 19.4ppg. Offense is clearly not his strength.

We have a great OL, a great stable of RBs. We have some decent, young receivers, and an a bunch of unknowns at QB. Further, the general consensus is that we need a vet QB regardless of if we take a QB at #1. It's very likely that our offense will be much better, with the same personnel, because of our coaching turnover. We won't suddenly turn into the Packers, but you can be damn sure we won't be held to 12.2ppg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This guy pre-draft was saying he could take or leave football, and he seems to have been playing with that mentality ever since lol.  
    • Agreed, another safety would be nice. Bud Clark, TCU, is one I would like to see us take a flyer on later in the draft, if he stays healthy and we don't take someone earlier. I just really hope we draft a solid C this year. Tired of seeing us cycle through average to below average players in that area.
    • Bryce doesn't like throwing into the middle of the field unless the play broke down or it's set up to give him a passing lane.  So because of this issue, most of the passing offense has to be outside the numbers towards the boundary. So you see him throw a lot of dump offs, swing routes, short side out routes, comebacks or deep balls outside the numbers using the boundary as protection of an interception.    Pretty easy for a NFL defense to see this and scheme against it.  All you have to do is run a shell cover 2 deep dime, LB plays a hook underneath, take the flat away with a blitz/flat zone option for the two inside DB's, outside two DB's play hook zone underneath and carry anything deep.    Pretty much what NO ran to take away Rico while also limiting What Bryce can do as well. 
×
×
  • Create New...