Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"We're 60 percent of the way along." - Rivera

Hoenheim

By Hoenheim,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I find it interesting they say that wide receiver is one of our most glaring needs..

If Steve Smith leaves......we have 3 sophomore WRs that combined for less than 1000 yards of offense. WR, despite our excitement is normally a 3 yr process and many hopeful stars fizzle along the way. Like a Colbert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncbobcat Newbie

ncbobcat

Posted
Posted

Ugh, so many holes yadda, yadda, yadda...go with a weak QB! All these articles are the same. The Panthers suck so they have to take a QB from a lackluster class, even though the WR, DT and even DB talent is 10x deeper and talented this year.

Yet, it makes perfect sense to go with the glamour QB position with all of these moron sports jounalists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I don't know why I read all these things.....

they commented there isn't a single strength on the roster? Only someone who doesn't watch Carolina would say that.

A healthy OL and healthy LB corp should be in consideration for best in the NFC.

people flat out don't watch 2 win teams.....and therefore they paint (or in this case, write) with broad and dumb strokes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Ugh, so many holes yadda, yadda, yadda...go with a weak QB! All these articles are the same. The Panthers suck so they have to take a QB from a lackluster class, even though the WR, DT and even DB talent is 10x deeper and talented this year.

Yet, it makes perfect sense to go with the glamour QB position with all of these moron sports jounalists.

Understand what you mean, but the group they have there aren't morons.

I may disagree with them on this point, but all of the guys they have on there are people Id say are worth listening to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blackcatgrowl Newbie

blackcatgrowl

Posted
Posted

I find it interesting they say that wide receiver is one of our most glaring needs..

I can see it.

We've got no consistent receivers except Smith. As awesome as he was, it's a fair statement to say his best days are behind him and there's lots of trade talk for him too. If we get a CBA, I'm sure he'll get shopped out.

Still need a QB to throw to whoever they go after though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CAVSS Newbie

CAVSS

Posted
Posted

Ugh, so many holes yadda, yadda, yadda...go with a weak QB! All these articles are the same. The Panthers suck so they have to take a QB from a lackluster class, even though the WR, DT and even DB talent is 10x deeper and talented this year.

Yet, it makes perfect sense to go with the glamour QB position with all of these moron sports jounalists.

I fail to understand your logic here. You are saying that it is stupid to take a QB early in a draft where there aren't many high potential QB's. Instead we should draft a WR, DT, or DB in the first round because there are so many available.

If I felt DT was our biggest need and there were only 2 good looking DT's in this draft THEN I would suggest going for one in the first round. If we needed a QB and there were a large amount of talented QB's then I would assume there would be quality left in the later rounds.

PS In last years draft Dareus would have been lucky to be the 3rd DT taken.

And PP7 would probably not gone before Eric Berry.

Fact is anyone we take at #1 in this draft is a reach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

I fail to understand your logic here. You are saying that it is stupid to take a QB early in a draft where there aren't many high potential QB's. Instead we should draft a WR, DT, or DB in the first round because there are so many available.

If I felt DT was our biggest need and there were only 2 good looking DT's in this draft THEN I would suggest going for one in the first round. If we needed a QB and there were a large amount of talented QB's then I would assume there would be quality left in the later rounds.

PS In last years draft Dareus would have been lucky to be the 3rd DT taken.

And PP7 would probably not gone before Eric Berry.

Fact is anyone we take at #1 in this draft is a reach.

I don't think Patrick Peterson is.

Dareus? Probably not either, but I'm more sure of Peterson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • UnluckyforSome
      NBC Sports 2026 NFL GM rankings

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      I think Canales goes before Young in that scenario.
    • tukafan21
      Joe Person: Panthers are NOT expected to extend Bryce Young before the 2026 season

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick, as opposed to bringing in a vet to start until the rookie is ready. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • strato
      Brown on BY9 while talking to Chris Long

      By strato · Posted

      I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
×
×
  • Create New...