Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do we still have a transition tag?

Highlandfire

By Highlandfire,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

mantal Newbie

mantal

Posted
Posted

I don't think that is correct. I believe Buffalo used both in one season. That said we burned our transition tag on Foster damn it...

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2342488

http://football.about.com/cs/football101/a/franchisetransi.htm

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080221051203AAfGFZw

http://www.dirtlocker.com/gossip/129289/teams-cant-use-franchise-tag-and-transition-tag

http://football.calsci.com/FreeAgency.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted

I don't think so Carp. I believe the transition can be used only one time by a team. The Franchise tag can be used each year, but I could swear the transition tag is a one time thing.

Nah, it used to be if you signed a player to a long term deal after giving him one of the tags you couldn't use either tag until said players contract ran out. Now both tags revert to the next season no matter what. Each team gets the chance to tag one player each off season.

The differences between the tag are different in some slight ways.

Franchise tag - salary - Top 5 players at position or 120 percent more previous year.

Exclusive - player can't talk to anyone about a contract but the team who tagged him.

Non exclusive- Player can talk to other clubs and try to get a trade done.

Transition tag - salary - top 10 players or 120 percent more then previous year.

Player can talk to other clubs and get signed by other clubs, gives tagging team the option to Counter offer the player to keep him.

Both type of the tags offer guaranteed contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Highlandfire Newbie

Highlandfire

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Carp, I found what it was that was stuck in the back of my mind...

"Each team can name one Franchise Player or one Transition Player. (Note: In the final year of the CBA, the team may elect to designate a Transition Players AND a Franchise Player -- or two Transition Players in lieu of naming a Franchise Player.) When the team places either tag on a player, they have effectively offered the player a one year contract at a predetermined annual wage."

Now here is the deal, is this 'officially' considered the last year of the CBA since the owners are opting out? If so I tag both thier asses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted

Carp, I found what it was that was stuck in the back of my mind...

"Each team can name one Franchise Player or one Transition Player. (Note: In the final year of the CBA, the team may elect to designate a Transition Players AND a Franchise Player -- or two Transition Players in lieu of naming a Franchise Player.) When the team places either tag on a player, they have effectively offered the player a one year contract at a predetermined annual wage."

Now here is the deal, is this 'officially' considered the last year of the CBA since the owners are opting out? If so I tag both thier asses.

No 2010 is I believe the last year of the current cba. There isn't a Cap though for the season. I believe it was put in place to help speed up the process of getting the CBA renewed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Highlandfire Newbie

Highlandfire

Posted
  • Author
Posted

No 2010 is I believe the last year of the current cba. There isn't a Cap though for the season. I believe it was put in place to help speed up the process of getting the CBA renewed.

Agreed. but now you can understand how somehow I thought two could be used. I remember reading that quite aways back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • RJK
      2025 Roster Cuts

      By RJK · Posted

      The Bucs waived shilo sanders after he got ejected. 
    • jfra78
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By jfra78 · Posted

      I'm just tired of ppl saying he's so accurate and then have to see recievers slow down to recieve the ball, ruining any chance at YAC
    • Icege
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By Icege · Posted

      Some people will really look at stuff like this and say "no more excuses" but then make excuses to try and explain away the validity of big-time throws. 🙃   Back on topic though, as I mentioned in the other AT thread earlier, I hope that the team is still exploring the deal. If the Vikings want the Panthers to take on some of the salary, then it had better be at worst a 4th-round pick (though I imagine Dan angling for a 3rd). If they're willing to take on all of it, then maybe at worst a 5th. Tough pill to swallow, giving up a 4th for a 35yr old WR, but if MIN believes they can have similar success behind McCarthy then it could be a smart deal for them. Hell, if AT has any gas in the tank and gives them a 1yr sweetheart deal to close out at home, even better for Minnesota. Yea, Bryce loses his best and most reliable WR. Hunter Renfrow though isn't what I would call a huge step down though (if he's as advertised throughout camp), and it gives more reps to TMac + XL + Coker. This season is all about continued development and answering some of the looming questions (Is Bryce the guy? Is Evero the DC going fwd? How do the young WRs develop? How long does it take this defense to bounce back from being historically awful?).
×
×
  • Create New...