Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2010 Carolina Panthers: What the Film Revealed

KaseKlosed

By KaseKlosed,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

KaseKlosed Community Regular

KaseKlosed

Posted
Posted

carolina-panthers-nfl-fitted-black-hats-id8095.jpg

2010 Carolina Panthers: What the Film Revealed

By ANDY BENOIT

While we wonder whether there will be a 2011 season, this is part of a series looking back at the 2010 season, with the benefit of film analysis. This week, we look at the N.F.C. South:

Offense

Carolina Panthers

On the bright side, the Panthers’ season answered once and for all the question of whether an N.F.L. team can win without a quarterback. The last coach to say a team could win sans a good quarterback was probably John Fox — and he changed his view a few years ago. Fox’s Panthers validated his new stance; neither Matt Moore nor Jimmy Clausen proved capable of executing a pro offense. Both were unable to read defenses before the snap and failed to push the ball downfield in the face of pressure. Clausen was particularly wide-eyed. He had three tricks in his bag: the checkdown, the dumpoff (usually a checkdown that occurs a second too late) and the throw away (usually a checkdown that occurs a second too early).

Because teams had zero respect for Carolina’s passing attack (which, to be fair to the quarterbacks, featured a receiving corps of ill-prepared youngsters and an unfocused Steve Smith), the ground game had no chance. It’s too bad because, aside from overwhelmed guard Mackenzy Bernadeau, the offensive line was adequate. Left tackle Jordan Gross played at his usual Pro Bowl level and center Ryan Kalil was once again agile in space and (usually) strong enough in traffic.

Defense

This would have been a top 15 defense had the safeties been a little savvier. The young starters Sherrod Martin and Charles Godfrey were not always on the same page as the cornerbacks. Everyone seemed to play a hair short of his abilities.

This wasn’t the case with the front seven. Jon Beason was his usual ravenous self at weakside and middle linebacker. Before hurting his hip, middle linebacker Dan Connolly was an excellent downhill force. And blooming authoritatively, at least early in the season, was the fifth-year pro James Anderson, who made countless solo plays against the run and pass.

Carolina’s most impressive player might have been defensive end Charles Johnson. Playing in a contract year, Johnson consistently reached the quarterback rushing inside and outside. He also proved adept in all phases of run defense. The Panthers’ problem was that not a single other pass-rusher seemed to show up (unless you count sixth-round rookie Greg Hardy, who displayed intriguing potential early on).

Myth Buster

Carolina is weak at defensive tackle

This is true from a pass-rushing standpoint, but on first and second down, the Panthers were consistently staunch inside. Undersized former Jaguar Derek Landri was tough to block because of his tirelessness and ability to penetrate. Andre Neblett played frequently down the stretch and was, at times, almost immovable. Nick Hayden had to rely on effort more than talent, which put a ceiling on his output, but he was rarely a weak spot. It would be justifiable for the Panthers to draft an explosive inside player early, but that doesn’t mean the incumbents are bums.

Something Positive

When healthy (which wasn’t often enough), DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart were shining stars, as always. But when they weren’t healthy, the Panthers were feeding the ball to Mike Goodson. The 2009 fourth-round pick turned out to be pretty intriguing. Goodson shows loose hips and speed early in runs. He accelerates well. If he learns to dance less and hones his pass-blocking, the Panthers will have, at the very least, a solid 15-touches-a-game-type back.

Andy Benoit is the founder of NFLTouchdown.com and a writer for the CBSSports.com Eye on Football blog

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/05/2010-carolina-panthers-what-the-film-revealed/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted

I think Anderson was more of a force than he is being credited with here. Other than that I am amazed that someone actually put together a well informed write up of the Panthers.

Kudos.

After about week 9 or so Anderson kinda became Na'il Diggs - solid, but anonymous. The impactful, eye-opening plays were almost all in the first half of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PleaseCutStewart
      26 first goal playoff thread

      By PleaseCutStewart · Posted

      Gonna go Blake again
    • The Third Reich
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By The Third Reich · Posted

      I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • The Third Reich
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By The Third Reich · Posted

      excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...