Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Judge Nelson to rule in couple weeks


Recommended Posts

I don't know that either side ever really engaged in meaningful negotiations without separate ulterior motives.

True. However, it does seem that the owners came to the table with a pretty solid proposal....only to have the players give them the big finger and walk out.

The players had EVERY intention of filing a lawsuit. Everything they did in the name of negotiating up until this point was bullshit posturing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that the judge might use a tactic in which she creates a lot of doubt for both sides making them think they might lose, in an effort to push them back to resolving issues in mediation rather than in federal court.

Which would make sense.

Whether or not it would actually work is another question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is what she said without saying it. Get your asses back to the table you really don't want me ruling on this. Two weeks? I bet she knows right now what she is going to rule on and is trying to give both moronic sides one last chance to get back to the table.

I have a strong feeling since she represented plaintiffs like the players in the past against big organizations, this is to give the players one last shot before she rules for the owners.

To me the owners offered up one hell of a new deal, made concessions and at least tried to bargain in good faith. There was NOTHING that kept the NFLPA from doing another 1 week extension except the fact they wanted to sue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

according to what i was watching on nfl network it doesn't require recertifying as it would be in a federal court setting away from all the jargon and was meant just to get this settled now rather then later..the judge was adamant about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True. However, it does seem that the owners came to the table with a pretty solid proposal....only to have the players give them the big finger and walk out.

The players had EVERY intention of filing a lawsuit. Everything they did in the name of negotiating up until this point was bullpoo posturing.

True.

But it was more than just posturing. They had a legal obligation to attempt to negotiate. Federal labor laws are specific about both sides negotiating in good faith. Had they just given the finger to the NFL when negotiations began, they would be in violation of those laws, and their asses would be in the legal fire.

The NFL Owner's contention (and happens to be most people's opinion on the huddle)... is that the NFLPA* did not negotiate in good faith anyhow, and made unreasonable demands.

I do hope the players get a smack down here. I honestly don't know one NFL fan personally who isn't sick to death of these high paid, sometimes criminal, dickwads acting like divas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

according to what i was watching on nfl network it doesn't require recertifying as it would be in a federal court setting away from all the jargon and was meant just to get this settled now rather then later..the judge was adamant about that.

That's interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...