Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dog Owners


88 Bronco

Recommended Posts

Our 2 dogs are small, so they don't take up too much space.

My wife and I disagree about them being on the couch, but my son has fixed that problem:) They can't lay on the couch anymore without him chasing after them, he's so awesome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had very strict rules, my wife has fought them since we're together.

When we first started living together, our dog wasn't allowed on the furniture or in the bedroom.

Then she wore me down and we let the dog sleep on the floor in the bedroom.

Then she wore me down more and we let the dog on the couches.

Then she wore me down more and the dog sleeps in the bed with us, and hogs the bed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First you said dog owners....then you said pets...sooo...

Nug can go anywhere except up on the counter and on the bathroom counters.....she does her own thing and then comes and gets in bed with me around 4am.

:)

Why are you using she when you talk about me...?:icon_bs:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my dogs come in alot during the winter but aren't allowed on the furniture. they typically sleep in my daughters bed with her, which amazes me as she'll be in that bed with the two shepherds and both her cats. How she sleeps, I'll never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my dogs come in alot during the winter but aren't allowed on the furniture. they typically sleep in my daughters bed with her, which amazes me as she'll be in that bed with the two shepherds and both her cats. How she sleeps, I'll never know.

it sounds like warm, safe and sound

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...