Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

One-other-scenario-to-ponder-on-Peppers : from YAS


carpanfan96

Recommended Posts

Actually, I do think this is a real option. The Panthers have more players to worry about than just Gross and Peppers. Chances are that the Panthers are going to have to release some players in order to use the franchise tag on Peppers. They will also not be able to re-sign players like Jeff King, Goeff Hangartner and Mark Jones or be able to try and sign FAs from other teams that hit the market.

Is getting compensation for Peppers worth potentielly losing maybe upwards of 8 players. Maybe some of the players the would cut anyways and maybe some of the FAs would leave anyways but is it worth it?

How would you feel if the Panthers cut Lucas and failed to re-sign King Hangartner and Jones and ended up only able to getting a 1st and 4th round pick out of it? That 1st round pick alone isn't going to replace two starters and the 4th round pick alone isn't going to replace two very important backups.

Then by the time they end up coming to a trade agreement all of the FAs will be off the market and the Panthers will be sitting with a number of holes and not enough to patch it up with.

I'm not trying to say that the Panthers should or shouldn't use the tag on Peppers. But their is alot to consider than just "get something for Peppers."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't understand why people think this is a possibility. Why, why, why would they just let him walk when they could tag him and trade him? I don't get it. It makes no sense. None.

For real. It was a waste of whatever energy went into displaying those words on the ESPN website.

I would say it was a waste of the mental energy Yas put into writing it, but it's obvious there was none involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I do think this is a real option. The Panthers have more players to worry about than just Gross and Peppers. Chances are that the Panthers are going to have to release some players in order to use the franchise tag on Peppers. They will also not be able to re-sign players like Jeff King, Goeff Hangartner and Mark Jones or be able to try and sign FAs from other teams that hit the market.

Is getting compensation for Peppers worth potentielly losing maybe upwards of 8 players. Maybe some of the players the would cut anyways and maybe some of the FAs would leave anyways but is it worth it?

How would you feel if the Panthers cut Lucas and failed to re-sign King Hangartner and Jones and ended up only able to getting a 1st and 4th round pick out of it? That 1st round pick alone isn't going to replace two starters and the 4th round pick alone isn't going to replace two very important backups.

Then by the time they end up coming to a trade agreement all of the FAs will be off the market and the Panthers will be sitting with a number of holes and not enough to patch it up with.

I'm not trying to say that the Panthers should or shouldn't use the tag on Peppers. But their is alot to consider than just "get something for Peppers."

Yeah, but that's not what he said. He said we might do it just to save the headache. He did mention the cap room at the very end, but only as another reason to consider doing it.

In any case, I don't think the cap room is that much of an issue. Gamble's bonus, cutting Lucas and restructing Delhomme, along with how we do Gross's contract, should take care of much if not all of it. Gross might cost $9 million or $10 million a year, but that's an average. I seriously doubt he'll cost that much THIS year, given the issue we have with Peppers' tag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but that's not what he said. He said we might do it just to save the headache. He did mention the cap room at the very end, but only as another reason to consider doing it.

In any case, I don't think the cap room is that much of an issue. Gamble's bonus, cutting Lucas and restructing Delhomme, along with how we do Gross's contract, should take care of much if not all of it. Gross might cost $9 million or $10 million a year, but that's an average. I seriously doubt he'll cost that much THIS year, given the issue we have with Peppers' tag.

But you are still cutting a starter in Lucas. And that will only allow the Panthers enough cap room to use the tag not the money needed to re-sign King, Hangartner and Jones.

Yas is a complete idiot, so on that I agree with you. But I get the feeling that if this does happen (the Panthers not using the tag) that this fan base is going to explode out of anger. In reality, not using the tag could be the better option. Maybe they know Lucas is already gone no matter what and they also know there is no chance of re-signing King and Hangartner. Then is decision is a lot easier to make. But we as fans don't know this information so I am reserving the need to call for the tag no matter what.

And just to let you know, I want them to use the tag. All I am doing is trying to point out a different view of the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chances are that the Panthers are going to have to release some players in order to use the franchise tag on Peppers. They will also not be able to re-sign players like Jeff King, Goeff Hangartner and Mark Jones or be able to try and sign FAs from other teams that hit the market.

Is getting compensation for Peppers worth potentielly losing maybe upwards of 8 players. Maybe some of the players the would cut anyways and maybe some of the FAs would leave anyways but is it worth it?

How would you feel if the Panthers cut Lucas and failed to re-sign King Hangartner and Jones and ended up only able to getting a 1st and 4th round pick out of it? That 1st round pick alone isn't going to replace two starters and the 4th round pick alone isn't going to replace two very important backups.

They have until Feb. 27th to get back under the salary cap. So they just need to make the trade after tagging Peppers before then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you are still cutting a starter in Lucas. And that will only allow the Panthers enough cap room to use the tag not the money needed to re-sign King, Hangartner and Jones.

Yas is a complete idiot, so on that I agree with you. But I get the feeling that if this does happen (the Panthers not using the tag) that this fan base is going to explode out of anger. In reality, not using the tag could be the better option. Maybe they know Lucas is already gone no matter what and they also know there is no chance of re-signing King and Hangartner. Then is decision is a lot easier to make. But we as fans don't know this information so I am reserving the need to call for the tag no matter what.

And just to let you know, I want them to use the tag. All I am doing is trying to point out a different view of the situation.

Yeah, I get what you are saying. It's true that a lot of the focus is just getting under the cap, and I guess it could leave us without any more room to sign some of those other key guys.

But I think the Gross deal, if it happens, won't end up costing that much this year. I wouldn't be surprised if his base salary is very low for just this reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have until Feb. 27th to get back under the salary cap. So they just need to make the trade after tagging Peppers before then.

If you know and understand this concept than so does 31 other GMs and they will use that in order to low ball the Panthers in a trade.

I guess trading him for a 3rd round pick in order for the team to re-sign other players and stay under the cap by the 27th is better than nothing but I doubt that is what most are expecting for compensation for Peppers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...