Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hired Guns


hepcat

Recommended Posts

This isn't what you think it's about.

Remember when I posted about quitting music all together recently? Well, those thoughts have subsided...somewhat...and I'm still trying to push forward with my band. It's a ska/reggae band, really upbeat, fun, bright, catchy. Trying to have it driven by a pretty big 4-5 piece horn section. I've been writing all the lines and composing the songs myself, and scoring them in Pro Tools (awesome feature where you can play the horn line on the piano in MIDI and it will score it out for you!)

I have established a pretty tight and committed rhythm section. But I've had a lot of trouble finding horn players that are good enough to play the lines I've written (they aren't easy) and committed enough to come to practice once to twice a week. I've been considering hiring horn players. The going rate for this is $10-20 an hour for rehearsal, and anywhere from $50-$150 per player a gig.

Is it worth it? The songs I've written are honestly pretty badass and if played with a tight enough group could do well in Austin and we could bring in some $$$. On the flip side, it'd be tight financially for me to pay horn players until the band started bringing in money. Aside from my job I'd really have to start banging out some recordings for the bands I track on the regular to pay for it so my job money just goes to my life.

I could also see some problems arising with some of the other guys in the band, in particular the rhythm section, because not only are they not getting paid but I'm going to ask if they are willing to pay for a horn section. Should I wait and hope I find some players that can handle it for free? Or hire a section and start gigging immediately?

oh and a sample of the work:

www.soundcloud.com/hipJ <---"Babylon" is the best example

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sweet hepcat.. You cant find anbody from other bands that could help you out? I get the ska scene might not be all that big down there, but still some horn players should be available. Might have to give some kids a shot and have them practice a whole lot...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice tunes, +Rep.

Ok, lessee, you are in Austin which has a pretty good Hispanic population.

What about putting out flyers to that demographic. I know there are Mariachi families and their kids learn to play horns and brass instruments from a very young age. Being they are more "modernized" than their parents, they might be willing to play ska.

Currently in the southern countries, contemporary bands are playing a mix of traditional/ska/new wave with horns and accordions and it sounds good. Los Rabanes and Los Pericos are good examples. El Gran Silencio is another.

Maybe a few like the sound and are influenced by those types of bands. plus. you might get them cheap.

Just a thought....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno about the whole hiring guys who are rooted in Latin music, it's sort of similar but doesn't have the same beat. Either way I'm going to have to train all the musicians in the band which might end up in my favor because I have a band that plays what I want, but at the same time I have to put all that effort in and it might end up burning me if crucial members quit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...