Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Anderson outshine Beason?


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Yes, it may sound like a dumb topic but I was watching some games from 2010 and Anderson absolutely dominated, also beat Beason statistically and I also know it was a bit hard for Beason who had to change sides due to Davis being injured.

Anderson stats 130 tackles, 4 sacks, 1 int, and 2 force fumbles pretty good for his first full year as a starter

Beason stats 121 tackles, 1 sack, 1 int, 2 force fumbles

Is it possible? :leaving:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Beason in the middle, his natural position? Highly unlikely. Also, Anderson faded near the end of last year once Beason moved back inside... coincidence?

That said, I like Anderson as a player and think he can be a good to very good player for years to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt it. Beason's on a mission this season, and gonna show why he should've been ranked higher than he was on that player's list. I also believe Anderson is a tad bit overhyped on this forum. He's still a good LB, but he won't outshine Beason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a huge difference between out producing and actually out performing him Anderson never gave up this season and played very well, but this was a contract year.

Anderson's becoming overated if people keep using his stats. I'm never trusting LB stats with an interior as terrible as ours was.

Anderson is dependable, not quite a dynamic playmaker, but he won't drop easy INTS. If he was a little more aware and instinctive he could be really, really good.

I definitely want him back but I sure hope all of his drive wasn't fueled by the contract year.

Anderson Beason and a healthy Davis/Connor is going to be ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a huge difference between out producing and actually out performing him Anderson never gave up this season and played very well, but this was a contract year.

Anderson's becoming overated if people keep using his stats. I'm never trusting LB stats with an interior as terrible as ours was.

Anderson is dependable, not quite a dynamic playmaker, but he won't drop easy INTS. If he was a little more aware and instinctive he could be really, really good.

I definitely want him back but I sure hope all of his drive wasn't fueled by the contract year.

Anderson Beason and a healthy Davis/Connor is going to be ridiculous.

I don't think he was really given a chance by Fox, he was invisible his two years here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anderson has been around a lot longer than 2 years unless you're referencing some other player.

Well he has never gotten a FULL chance to start the whole season. Another great example by Fox coaching, even though he did a good job his first year with 18 tackles and 2 sacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well he has never gotten a FULL chance to start the whole season. Another great example by Fox coaching, even though he did a good job his first year with 18 tackles and 2 sacks.

If there is one position Fox consistently got right during his time in Carolina, it was LB (Morgan over Witherspoon notwithstanding). Perhaps Anderson could have outperformed Diggs, but Diggs was not bad, just not flashy, and neither is Anderson really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Anderson can outshine beason. He will still perform and compliment him. I expect his production to drop if davis can stay healthy, but he'll take care of his side no doubt. We might have one of the best linebacker groups out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...