Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

South Carolina should change its name.


malik

Recommended Posts

No one in Columbia is hot.

Every female has super nasty piercings and just look gross in general....I thought Washington, NC was bad....then I came to Columbia!

Military towns -especially Army towns - don't count. You should know this.

Columbia and Fayetteville are automatically thrown out of any comparisons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have spent some time in Charleston. I have also traveled around the world. I just don't see anything special about Charleston. Its a small city with a port, and a few nice bars/restaurants. In that regard, its no different really than a hundred other cities that I have visited. I don't really want to live in either, but I would certainly prefer Charlotte to Charleston. In fact, it wouldn't even be close. More jobs, more to do, close to the mountains and beaches, and fewer mosquitos.

IAWTP.

Nothing really special - just a very overpriced aquarium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This coming from some whose State consists of city that's basically Vegas with more murders and fewer open container laws surrounded by one ongoing episode of Swamp People.

sounds pretty awesome

sorry if going to the wal-mart on sunday for cheap beer isnt the fun we have :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is one thing that I find unique about South Carolina. In the Piedmont, we tend to see neighborhoods that have similar age, similar levels of wealth or poverty, similar styles of houses etc...

But the last two times I drove through rural areas of South Carolina, you would nice big brick homes surrounded by run down homes or singlewides. I imagine its not that way around the larger cities, but it certainly seems to occur a lot in the smaller rural communities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Military towns -especially Army towns - don't count. You should know this.

Columbia and Fayetteville are automatically thrown out of any comparisons.

Clarksville TN (Fort Campbell) wasnt so bad...

But you are totally correct...throw in the fact that Jackson is TRADOC and you have ugly/trashiness times infinity!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:smilielol5: lol ok. Everything east of Charlotte is great.

"Great" isn't the adjective I'd use. More like "Tolerable"

No one in Columbia is hot.

Every female has super nasty piercings and just look gross in general....I thought Washington, NC was bad....then I came to Columbia!

School's not in session. Wait until USC opens back up. There are TONS of hot girls, especially in downtown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So answer the question. Why did Chark and Hurst have the same metrics (go look them up, I did... and one was actually worse in LA) with Justin Herbert? Why did Mingo have the same metrics with Dak? You're right, there is a common denominator, just not the one you're trying to make.  Why could DJ Moore get open with Bridgewater, Allen, Cam 2.0, Darnold, Baker, Williams, Bagent? I'll answer the question for you - because he is a good WR unlike Chark/Hurst/Mingo. 
    • I mean I just don't understand the argument. Baker and Sam both have been pro bowl QBs post their time here. And you just said yourself that is due to him having a damn good roster around him and they are well coached. You're even saying the bad baker is still there somewhere, but he is in a good organization with good roster and coaching that they are getting the best out of him. Why does Baker and Sam get all that benefit of the doubt but when it comes to Bryce it must be a BY9 problem, not an org or team problem?  Hell I got a guy below you arguing with me that Chark/Hurst/Mingo sucked because Bryce wouldn't throw them open. It's ridiculous how far the stretch goes. 
    • Correct.  It’s really hard to get open in the NFL when opposing defenses gameplan and cheat coverage/routes on all your players because they know your QB can’t make certain throws/plays.   magically no one that comes to Carolina can get open or make plays with the ball in their hands…..it’s like there is one singular common dominator to it all.  BY makes playing defense way too easy.   NFL players are too good to allow one side to cheat coverage and not respect all the potential threats of a route  so you can dial up a great play.  But if corners and safeties just cheat coverage and know X and Y happening on route/threats….getting open gets hard when they just play it one way.  Getting open has a lot to do with the different threats a WR can pose on a given play.  
×
×
  • Create New...