Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Clausen Hurt?

Hairless Cat

By Hairless Cat,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

and the know nothings continue to bash Clausen at every opportunity...

THANK YOU!! If you cannot see Clausen's development this year, you are a dumbass. The fact that Cam is here and not outplaying Clausen--as Moore did not, as Pike did not, as St. Peirre did not, as Null did not--should tell you that inexperienced WRs and a makeshift line do not give the QB much of an opportunity to succeed.

I am not trying to promote Jimmy Clausen, I am trying to dispell ignorance-- and I found a good place to start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Stryker Newbie

Ted Stryker

Posted
Posted

THANK YOU!! If you cannot see Clausen's development this year, you are a dumbass. The fact that Cam is here and not outplaying Clausen--as Moore did not, as Pike did not, as St. Peirre did not, as Null did not--should tell you that inexperienced WRs and a makeshift line do not give the QB much of an opportunity to succeed.

I am not trying to promote Jimmy Clausen, I am trying to dispell ignorance-- and I found a good place to start.

He doesn't have a pro arm, period. You can't coach that up, sorry. Forget Cam or any other QB here look at some of the good to elite starters in the league. In no way shape or form does Jimmy begin to stack up. Yes Jimmy is a little better this year but like the old saying goes "you can't polish a turd"

As far as calling out ignorance your statement could be considered ignorant by people like me who never wanted Jimmy to be drafted in the first place

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Stryker Newbie

Ted Stryker

Posted
Posted

THANK YOU!! If you cannot see Clausen's development this year, you are a dumbass. The fact that Cam is here and not outplaying Clausen--asMooredid not, as Pike did not, as St. Peirre did not, as Null did not--should tell you that inexperienced WRs and a makeshift line do not give the QB much of an opportunity to succeed.

I am not trying to promote Jimmy Clausen, I am trying to dispell ignorance-- and I found a good place to start.

Ummm... You've met TRD haven't you, if not you're getting ready to

And no he didn't outplay Moore, Matt got hurt

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Stryker Newbie

Ted Stryker

Posted
Posted

If he doesn't have a pro arm he would not be in the NFL much less a high second round draft choice.

You do not know more than NFL scouts.

No one said I did, but give me a break, the guy floats anything over 15 yards there isn't alot of zip on any deep ball I've ever seen him throw

I think alot of people are deluding themselves into thinking Clausen is any good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...