Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who will be the top 5 QBs 5 years from now?


Grammer

Recommended Posts

Really? Luck? Before he's even taken an NFL snap he's TOP FIVE, five years from now?

Luck is going to be a great QB. Manning was already in this range (maybe a little lower) 5 years into his career. Dan Marino certainly was the best QB from 1984-1989.

It's not as crazy as you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Passing stats shouldn't make you the best. That being said, Rivers and Schaub will continue to put up huge numbers and produce losses in the postseason, when they get to the postseason.

Schaub can not be considered one of the best when he has the best WR in football and they have never, ever, been higher than 9-7. And that was once. So only one time in his career has his team been above 500. And after that season they went 6-10.

He has the worlds best, most consistent WR in the league and had the NFLs leading rusher last season. You can say what you want about his team having a bad defense but the truth is there are QBs out there with teams in the past that had no defense, and less to work with on offense, and they still won. The guy isn't a winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rodgers

Rivers

Stafford (maybe if he stays healthy)

Bradford

Either a current rookie or Luck will develop into a top 5 QB

Maybe Matt Ryan, he could replace stafford on my list.

Schaub puts up good numbers but isn't a winner yet and he is already getting their in age.

I like Josh Freeman but don't ever see him becoming and "elite" qb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
    • I parked in this lot a few times. It would take over and hour to get out of that lot after games. Never again
×
×
  • Create New...