Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who will be the top 5 QBs 5 years from now?


Grammer

Recommended Posts

Really? Luck? Before he's even taken an NFL snap he's TOP FIVE, five years from now?

Luck is going to be a great QB. Manning was already in this range (maybe a little lower) 5 years into his career. Dan Marino certainly was the best QB from 1984-1989.

It's not as crazy as you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Passing stats shouldn't make you the best. That being said, Rivers and Schaub will continue to put up huge numbers and produce losses in the postseason, when they get to the postseason.

Schaub can not be considered one of the best when he has the best WR in football and they have never, ever, been higher than 9-7. And that was once. So only one time in his career has his team been above 500. And after that season they went 6-10.

He has the worlds best, most consistent WR in the league and had the NFLs leading rusher last season. You can say what you want about his team having a bad defense but the truth is there are QBs out there with teams in the past that had no defense, and less to work with on offense, and they still won. The guy isn't a winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rodgers

Rivers

Stafford (maybe if he stays healthy)

Bradford

Either a current rookie or Luck will develop into a top 5 QB

Maybe Matt Ryan, he could replace stafford on my list.

Schaub puts up good numbers but isn't a winner yet and he is already getting their in age.

I like Josh Freeman but don't ever see him becoming and "elite" qb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean I just don't understand the argument. Baker and Sam both have been pro bowl QBs post their time here. And you just said yourself that is due to him having a damn good roster around him and they are well coached. You're even saying the bad baker is still there somewhere, but he is in a good organization with good roster and coaching that they are getting the best out of him. Why does Baker and Sam get all that benefit of the doubt but when it comes to Bryce it must be a BY9 problem, not an org or team problem?  Hell I got a guy below you arguing with me that Chark/Hurst/Mingo sucked because Bryce wouldn't throw them open. It's ridiculous how far the stretch goes. 
    • Correct.  It’s really hard to get open in the NFL when opposing defenses gameplan and cheat coverage/routes on all your players because they know your QB can’t make certain throws/plays.   magically no one that comes to Carolina can get open or make plays with the ball in their hands…..it’s like there is one singular common dominator to it all.  BY makes playing defense way too easy.   NFL players are too good to allow one side to cheat coverage and not respect all the potential threats of a route  so you can dial up a great play.  But if corners and safeties just cheat coverage and know X and Y happening on route/threats….getting open gets hard when they just play it one way.  Getting open has a lot to do with the different threats a WR can pose on a given play.  
    • Kinda depends how you look at it both were 3rd round draft pics.  Nico was nothing before stroud and tank came in with stroud.  If both were on the panthers would young have them doing well and starting or would their stats be low.  I really dont know the answer to that.  None of the panthers wrs have left and did well either but personally i feel neither of nico or tank would do much on the panthers.  
×
×
  • Create New...